In my opinion, grouping students by similar skill levels is a good strategy. This viewpoint aligns with Claire’s argument that similar skill levels can reduce disagreements and help the group focus on the task at hand. I would further argue that grouping students by skill level ensures all members can participate equally. To be more specific, when students with similar abilities work together, they are more likely to contribute to the project at an equal level, making the experience more collaborative. This way, no one feels overwhelmed or left out, and everyone can contribute meaningfully to the project, leading to a more productive learning environment. For example, my cousin Ethan was assigned to a group project in his history class. He was grouped with other students who had similar academic strengths, which made the project flow smoothly. Everyone had a chance to express their ideas, and they all worked on different parts of the project, making it a balanced and efficient effort. Ethan was in charge of the research, while other members focused on the presentation and visuals. They met regularly, and since they were on the same level, it allowed for a more cohesive and less stressful collaboration. To conclude, grouping students by similar skill levels promotes equal participation, making group work more effective and fair for all students.