纠错
置顶

The Problem with Microplastics

纠错

According to paragraph 2, why were the results of the 2010-2011 study unexpected?

Click on an oval to select your answer. To choose a different answer,

click one different oval.

  • A
    Previous studies of the surface of the ocean had found many more microplastics than the 2010-2011 study did.
  • B
    Scientists conducting the 2010-2011 study found that larger, heavier pieces of plastic remained on the surface instead of sinking to the bottom.
  • C
    Scientists believed that a much larger quantity of plastics had entered the ocean than were found in the 2010-2011 study.
  • D
    The 2010-2011 study revealed that different locations on the ocean's surface had very different quantities of microplastics.
显示答案
正确答案: C

我的笔记 编辑笔记

  • 原文
  • 译文
  • Scientists think that about 10 percent of all plastic, which includes plastic bags and bottles, ends up in the ocean. The attributes that make plastic a useful material for a large number of products are its light weight and the strong chemical bonds in its internal structure, which make the material durable. Because plastic by itself is less dense than water, it floats along the ocean surface where it is continuously exposed to ultraviolet light from the Sun, which has the effect of loosening its chemical bonds. Ocean waves smash these weakened pieces of plastic against each other, and they are broken down into smaller and smaller pieces, eventually creating vast numbers of microplastics (pieces less than 5 millimeters across) that disperse throughout the water.



    Due to the widespread increase in plastic production, there is six times as much plastic in the oceans as there was 40 years ago. Based on the amount of manufactured plastic, scientists have estimated that there are many trillion pieces of plastic in the ocean. To obtain a more precise idea about the amount, scientists conducted a study in 2010-2011 that involved sampling the ocean surface at 141 locations. After six months they concluded that only 7,000 to 35,000 tons of plastic were present on the ocean surface. It is widely believed, however, that tens of millions of tons of plastics have entered ocean waters. Moreover, the scientists primarily found larger pieces of plastic, which means that the quantity of microplastics found diverged from expectations to an even greater degree.



    Scientists have attempted to explain the apparent disappearance of vast amounts of plastic from the surface of the ocean. Plastic is hydrophobic-it repels water, like oil does-which by itself contributes to its buoyancy (ability to float). However, this hydrophobic quality attracts single-celled organisms, such as diatoms and bacteria, which attach themselves to the plastic's surface and replicate. Over time the resulting biofilm (layer of organisms) alters the density of the plastic and reduces its degree of hydrophobia, increasing its chances of sinking. Organisms residing in the biofilm release certain chemicals that attract other organisms, including barnacles, aquatic insects, and algae, which make their homes on the plastic. This adds to the plastic's weight and further increases its chances of sinking. In one experiment scientists submerged plastic food bags for three weeks, measuring the amount of biofilm and buoyancy of the bags each week. The bags sank deeper during each week of the experiment. Severe coastal storms and vertical movement of water associated with differences in temperature or salinity may be another reason why microplastics move into deeper waters. Scientists have found as many as 40 pieces of microplastic per 50 milliliters of sediment in locations sampled along the ocean floor.



    Some of the microplastics are likely ingested (eaten) by ocean organisms. Many marine invertebrates (animals lacking a backbone) are filter feeders-they draw water into their bodies and ingest tiny bits of food contained within it. These animals do not discriminate among food items and can easily take in plastics along with the rest of their meal. Thus, scientists have found microplastics in the bodies of marine organisms, including zooplankton, crabs fish, and marine worms. Although the plastic by itself can remain in or pass through the animals' bodies without significantly affecting them, many plastics come with pollutants left over from the manufacturing process or picked up as the plastics travel through the oceans, and these chemicals are often harmful to the animals.



    Copepods-tiny, free-swimming organisms that eat algae-are among the filter feeders that have been found to ingest microplastics. But then, in an apparent attempt to avoid taking in even more of these materials, copepods switch to feeding on smaller algae, ones that are even tinier than microplastics. As a result of this diet change, copepods' energy intake can drop by as much as 40 percent. These copepods lay smaller eggs that are unable to hatch successfully. Microplastics may also get stuck in the antennae of copepods and other zooplankton, where they interfere with the organisms' ability to sense food in the surrounding waters, and also in copepods' joints, limiting their ability to move and catch prey.


  • 暂无译文

  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 标签
    0 感谢 不懂
    解析

    【答案】C

    【题型】事实信息题

    【解析】题干涉及事件为“2010-2011研究的结果很出乎意料”,问为什么出乎意料,注意否定逻辑unexpected。根据2010-2011定位到原文第三句,提到科学家开始这样一种研究,后一句开始描述研究结果“only 7,000 to 35,000吨塑料被发现” 。从“ It is widely believed, however...”开始转折,重点关注,说的是“大家普遍认为几千万吨的塑料流入了海洋”。也就是实际发现的塑料量要远远小于大家普遍认为流入海洋的塑料量,这部分信息对应选项C。

    选项A,原文未提及previous studies和2010-2011 study的比较关系。

    选项B,原文未提及on the surface与sinking to the bottom 之间的比较关系。

    选项D,原文未提及 different locations之间的比较关系。

    综上答案为C。

题目讨论

如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。

最新提问