纠错
置顶

The Problem with Microplastics

纠错

Which of the following best summarizes the results of the experiment with plastic food bags that is described in paragraph 3?

Click on an oval to select your answer. To choose a different answer,

click one different oval.

  • A
    The sinking of plastics can be explained by rapid changes in ocean water's temperature and salinity.
  • B
    The buoyancy of the plastic decreased over the time of the experiment.
  • C
    Different bags sank at different rates.
  • D
    Warm water caused the plastic to sink deeper.
显示答案
正确答案: B

我的笔记 编辑笔记

  • 原文
  • 译文
  • Scientists think that about 10 percent of all plastic, which includes plastic bags and bottles, ends up in the ocean. The attributes that make plastic a useful material for a large number of products are its light weight and the strong chemical bonds in its internal structure, which make the material durable. Because plastic by itself is less dense than water, it floats along the ocean surface where it is continuously exposed to ultraviolet light from the Sun, which has the effect of loosening its chemical bonds. Ocean waves smash these weakened pieces of plastic against each other, and they are broken down into smaller and smaller pieces, eventually creating vast numbers of microplastics (pieces less than 5 millimeters across) that disperse throughout the water.



    Due to the widespread increase in plastic production, there is six times as much plastic in the oceans as there was 40 years ago. Based on the amount of manufactured plastic, scientists have estimated that there are many trillion pieces of plastic in the ocean. To obtain a more precise idea about the amount, scientists conducted a study in 2010-2011 that involved sampling the ocean surface at 141 locations. After six months they concluded that only 7,000 to 35,000 tons of plastic were present on the ocean surface. It is widely believed, however, that tens of millions of tons of plastics have entered ocean waters. Moreover, the scientists primarily found larger pieces of plastic, which means that the quantity of microplastics found diverged from expectations to an even greater degree.



    Scientists have attempted to explain the apparent disappearance of vast amounts of plastic from the surface of the ocean. Plastic is hydrophobic-it repels water, like oil does-which by itself contributes to its buoyancy (ability to float). However, this hydrophobic quality attracts single-celled organisms, such as diatoms and bacteria, which attach themselves to the plastic's surface and replicate. Over time the resulting biofilm (layer of organisms) alters the density of the plastic and reduces its degree of hydrophobia, increasing its chances of sinking. Organisms residing in the biofilm release certain chemicals that attract other organisms, including barnacles, aquatic insects, and algae, which make their homes on the plastic. This adds to the plastic's weight and further increases its chances of sinking. In one experiment scientists submerged plastic food bags for three weeks, measuring the amount of biofilm and buoyancy of the bags each week. The bags sank deeper during each week of the experiment. Severe coastal storms and vertical movement of water associated with differences in temperature or salinity may be another reason why microplastics move into deeper waters. Scientists have found as many as 40 pieces of microplastic per 50 milliliters of sediment in locations sampled along the ocean floor.



    Some of the microplastics are likely ingested (eaten) by ocean organisms. Many marine invertebrates (animals lacking a backbone) are filter feeders-they draw water into their bodies and ingest tiny bits of food contained within it. These animals do not discriminate among food items and can easily take in plastics along with the rest of their meal. Thus, scientists have found microplastics in the bodies of marine organisms, including zooplankton, crabs fish, and marine worms. Although the plastic by itself can remain in or pass through the animals' bodies without significantly affecting them, many plastics come with pollutants left over from the manufacturing process or picked up as the plastics travel through the oceans, and these chemicals are often harmful to the animals.



    Copepods-tiny, free-swimming organisms that eat algae-are among the filter feeders that have been found to ingest microplastics. But then, in an apparent attempt to avoid taking in even more of these materials, copepods switch to feeding on smaller algae, ones that are even tinier than microplastics. As a result of this diet change, copepods' energy intake can drop by as much as 40 percent. These copepods lay smaller eggs that are unable to hatch successfully. Microplastics may also get stuck in the antennae of copepods and other zooplankton, where they interfere with the organisms' ability to sense food in the surrounding waters, and also in copepods' joints, limiting their ability to move and catch prey.


  • 暂无译文

  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 标签
    4 感谢 不懂
    解析

    【答案】B

    【题型】事实信息题

    【解析】题干问的是“食品塑料袋的实验结果是什么”,利用关键词“the experiment with plastic food bags”可以定位至“In one experiment scientists...”这句话,说的是科学家将塑料袋浸在海里几周,并每周测量塑料袋上的biofilm数量,以及塑料袋的浮力。后一句继续说塑料袋每周都会下沉更深。这部分信息说明的结论对应选项B:“塑料袋的浮力随着实验时间而降低。” 接下来一句“Severe coastal storms...”说的是another reason,与题干问的实验没有关系了。

    这道题如果多注意段落结构则会更容易,段落首句说到科学家试图解释海洋表面大量塑料消失的原因,第二句就提到了重要信息:塑料有buoyancy(浮力)。第三句开始与前句方向转折,一直到题干定位句“In one experiment scientists...”之前一共四句话,都是顺向关系,描述塑料是如何失去它的浮力的,主要意思就是海里有些单细胞动物会附着在塑料上,慢慢形成一个biofilm(生物薄膜), 然后继续吸引新的生物,慢慢增加塑料的重要,使它下沉。然后到了题干定位处,进一步用具体实验来证明上述观点,也就是塑料袋浮力下降导致它沉入海底。

    选项A,temperature and salinity在倒数第二句说到,与题干实验无关,属于答非所问的区间。

    选项C,不同的袋子下沉速率不一样,未提及。

    选项D,warm water未提及,且跟温度相关的内容在倒数第二句,与A一样答非所问。

    综上答案为B。

题目讨论

如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。

最新提问