机经真题 10 Passage 2

纠错
置顶

The Origin of Flight

纠错

Directions: An introductory sentence for a brief summary of the passage is provided below. Complete the summary by selecting the THREE answer choices that express the most important ideas in the passage. Some sentences do not belong in the summary because they express ideas that are not presented in the passage or are minor ideas in the passage. This question is worth 2 points. Drag your choices to the spaces where they belong. To review the passage, select View Passage.

Drag your answer choices to the spaces where they belong. To remove an answer choice, click on it.To review the passage, click VIEW TEXT.

Several hypotheses attempt to explain the evolution of flight.

显示答案
正确答案: A C E
  • A.
    Flight may have occurred first among tree-climbing species, but it is not clear how complex wings could have evolved from the gliding structures that such animals would have had.
  • B.
    The evolution of large feathered limbs would have led to more food captures and increased an animal's running speed significantly, making flight possible.
  • C.
    It is possible that protobirds hid from their prey before attacking, and flight may have evolved gradually in these animals in order to support hunting.
  • D.
    Flight may have originated among ancestors of Draco lizards, whose fanlike structures would have developed into feathered wings when their species evolved endothermy.
  • E.
    An animal that used feathered front limbs to catch prey while moving quickly may have begun to fly by using its limbs for lift while jumping.
  • F.
    In addition to running and jumping, protobirds may have needed to swoop from one hiding place to another to avoid predators, but whether flight could have evolved from swooping is unclear.

我的笔记 编辑笔记

  • 原文
  • 译文


  • Evolutionary innovations such as the ability to fly do not appear from the first in their finished form; they must progress through intermediate developmental states that are themselves adaptive. If a design does not work for some purpose, it is unlikely to last long enough to be modified further by evolutionary influences. Nevertheless, transition innovations do not necessarily serve the same function as their ultimate forms. For example, feathers evolved from the scales of birds' reptilian ancestors. But long before the complex structure of flight feathers came about, simpler designs functioned perfectly well to insulate small, active protobirds (the earliest form of birds) from the cold. A feathered body covering likely evolved along with endothermy; maintaining a high body temperature requires a lot of food, so there is considerable benefit to reducing heat loss. A myriad of small feathered dinosaurs, including Sinocalliopteryx and Sinosauropteryx, have recently been unearthed in fossil beds in China. These reptiles did not use their feathers for flight because their feathers lacked the rigid structure of vaned feathers (which make up modern birds' outer coat) and more closely resembled the down feathers that modern birds wear under their outer coat. Hence it follows that protobirds did not just leap into the air one day to become flying vertebrates. So how did it happen?



    The truth may ultimately be explained by one of two proposed hypotheses, or more likely a combination of both. The arboreal hypothesis, first championed by the paleontologist Othniel C. Marsh, suggests that birds started out as tree-climbing animals, then later evolved wings to assist in controlled glides to the ground or to lower branches. The premise that flight originated in tree-dwelling animals has the advantage that gravity would initiate takeoff, which is perhaps the most difficult part of flying. However, proponents of this hypothesis fail to explain how complex feathered wings could evolve from structures used primarily for gliding. Other gliding vertebrates-for example, flying squirrels and sugar gliders-use sail-like skin folds extended between their outstretched limbs to glide between trees. Draco lizards extend fanlike structures that are supported by elongated ribs. Birds, however, fly by flapping their front limbs; gliding membranes along the length of the body are simply not conducive to the evolution of feathered wings.



    The cursorial, or running, hypothesis (first developed by Samuel Wendell Williston) suggests that birds began as small, two-legged running dinosaurs that used their front limbs to catch insects or other small prey and that flight began as a series of short jumps into the air. Any increase in the surface area of the forelimbs, perhaps by elongation of the feathers already covering them, would increase the height of the jump and overall stability by providing a little more upward force, or lift, on the bird. Eventually arms would become wings and jumps would lead to flight. Research simulations suggest that this running-and-jumping mode of foraging could indeed yield more food captures. It is generally accepted that birds' ancestors were small, agile dinosaurs-characteristically two-legged species such as Velociraptor-so this hypothesis makes sense. However, because of the added resistance when sweeping them through the air, some paleontologists doubt that oversized feathered front limbs would offer an advantage for catching prey. They also feel that the ground speed required for takeoff would exceed the maximum running speeds of existing lizards and running birds by a factor of three. It is possible, however, that protobirds used wind speed to increase lift during takeoff by moving into the wind as it blew against them, as aircraft do.



    More recently, paleornithologists have proposed a third model-the pouncing proavis hypothesis-which combines some elements of the previous two. This model describes protobirds as small, active ambush predators that hid on elevated perches such as shrubs or boulders, then jumped or swooped down to capture prey. Additional lift would allow longer and more controlled swoops, particularly if feather and wing development focused on the hands, the location of primary flight feathers responsible for forward thrust in modern birds. This hypothesis implies a gentler, more gradual approach to the evolution of flight; even the intermediate stages of feather and wing development would provide some adaptive advantage to the animal sporting them.


  • 暂无译文

  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 标签
    0 感谢 不懂
    解析

    【题型】文章小结题

    【答案】ACE

    【解析】

    A. 正确。因为它总结了树栖假说的关键点,即飞行可能首先出现在树栖物种中,但支持者没有解释原本用于滑翔的结构如何进化成复杂的羽翼。

    B. 错误。虽然前肢羽毛的增加被认为可能提高捕食率,但是没有证据表明它们会显著增加跑速,进而使飞行成为可能。

    C. 正确。因为它总结了投袭假说的关键点,即原鸟类可能在攻击前隐藏起来,飞行可能逐渐进化以支持捕猎。

    D. 错误。因为这个段落没有提到 Draco蜥蜴或它们的扇状结构与飞行的进化有关。

    E. 正确。因为它总结了奔跑假说的关键点,即用了的羽毛前肢捕猎动物可能通过跳跃时利用前肢获取升力,从而开始飞行。

    F. 错误。因为段落并没有讨论原鸟类为了避免捕食者而从一个隐藏处飞到另一个隐藏处的必要性。

题目讨论

如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。

最新提问