机经真题 10 Passage 2

纠错
置顶

The Origin of Flight

纠错

According to paragraph 4, which of the following does the pouncing proavis model claim about the evolution of flight?

Click on an oval to select your answer. To choose a different answer,

click one different oval.

  • A
    Flight evolved to help protobirds escape from predators swooping down on them from above.
  • B
    Feathers first evolved to help protobirds hide so that they could ambush their prey.
  • C
    Developing wings helped predators make controlled downward jumps even before flight evolved.
  • D
    Protobirds evolved primary flight feathers that gave them enough lift to take off from the ground.
显示答案
正确答案: C

我的笔记 编辑笔记

  • 原文
  • 译文


  • Evolutionary innovations such as the ability to fly do not appear from the first in their finished form; they must progress through intermediate developmental states that are themselves adaptive. If a design does not work for some purpose, it is unlikely to last long enough to be modified further by evolutionary influences. Nevertheless, transition innovations do not necessarily serve the same function as their ultimate forms. For example, feathers evolved from the scales of birds' reptilian ancestors. But long before the complex structure of flight feathers came about, simpler designs functioned perfectly well to insulate small, active protobirds (the earliest form of birds) from the cold. A feathered body covering likely evolved along with endothermy; maintaining a high body temperature requires a lot of food, so there is considerable benefit to reducing heat loss. A myriad of small feathered dinosaurs, including Sinocalliopteryx and Sinosauropteryx, have recently been unearthed in fossil beds in China. These reptiles did not use their feathers for flight because their feathers lacked the rigid structure of vaned feathers (which make up modern birds' outer coat) and more closely resembled the down feathers that modern birds wear under their outer coat. Hence it follows that protobirds did not just leap into the air one day to become flying vertebrates. So how did it happen?



    The truth may ultimately be explained by one of two proposed hypotheses, or more likely a combination of both. The arboreal hypothesis, first championed by the paleontologist Othniel C. Marsh, suggests that birds started out as tree-climbing animals, then later evolved wings to assist in controlled glides to the ground or to lower branches. The premise that flight originated in tree-dwelling animals has the advantage that gravity would initiate takeoff, which is perhaps the most difficult part of flying. However, proponents of this hypothesis fail to explain how complex feathered wings could evolve from structures used primarily for gliding. Other gliding vertebrates-for example, flying squirrels and sugar gliders-use sail-like skin folds extended between their outstretched limbs to glide between trees. Draco lizards extend fanlike structures that are supported by elongated ribs. Birds, however, fly by flapping their front limbs; gliding membranes along the length of the body are simply not conducive to the evolution of feathered wings.



    The cursorial, or running, hypothesis (first developed by Samuel Wendell Williston) suggests that birds began as small, two-legged running dinosaurs that used their front limbs to catch insects or other small prey and that flight began as a series of short jumps into the air. Any increase in the surface area of the forelimbs, perhaps by elongation of the feathers already covering them, would increase the height of the jump and overall stability by providing a little more upward force, or lift, on the bird. Eventually arms would become wings and jumps would lead to flight. Research simulations suggest that this running-and-jumping mode of foraging could indeed yield more food captures. It is generally accepted that birds' ancestors were small, agile dinosaurs-characteristically two-legged species such as Velociraptor-so this hypothesis makes sense. However, because of the added resistance when sweeping them through the air, some paleontologists doubt that oversized feathered front limbs would offer an advantage for catching prey. They also feel that the ground speed required for takeoff would exceed the maximum running speeds of existing lizards and running birds by a factor of three. It is possible, however, that protobirds used wind speed to increase lift during takeoff by moving into the wind as it blew against them, as aircraft do.



    More recently, paleornithologists have proposed a third model-the pouncing proavis hypothesis-which combines some elements of the previous two. This model describes protobirds as small, active ambush predators that hid on elevated perches such as shrubs or boulders, then jumped or swooped down to capture prey. Additional lift would allow longer and more controlled swoops, particularly if feather and wing development focused on the hands, the location of primary flight feathers responsible for forward thrust in modern birds. This hypothesis implies a gentler, more gradual approach to the evolution of flight; even the intermediate stages of feather and wing development would provide some adaptive advantage to the animal sporting them.


  • 暂无译文

  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 标签
    0 感谢 不懂
    解析

    【题型】事实信息题

    【答案】C

    【解析】

    A. 错误。段落中提到的是原鸟类作为伏击捕食者从高处跳下或俯冲以捕捉猎物,而不是为了逃避捕食者。

    B. 错误。段落没有提到羽毛是为了帮助原鸟类隐藏自己。相反,段落提到羽毛和翅膀的发展有助于增加飞行的推力。

    C. 正确。段落明确提到增加的升力使得原鸟类能够更长时间、更受控制地俯冲,尤其是当羽毛和翅膀的发展集中在手部时,这些羽毛负责现代鸟类的前向推力。这表明翅膀的发展在飞行进化之前就有助于控制向下的跳跃。

    D. 错误。段落中没有提到原鸟类进化出足够的升力使它们从地面起飞。段落强调的是俯冲而不是从地面直接起飞。

题目讨论

如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。

最新提问