托福阅读新真经模考一

分享小红书,免费领会员
Font Size: 默认
  • Font Size:默认
  • Font Size:14px
  • Font Size:20px
  • Font Size:16px
  • Font Size:18px

Question 4 of 10

收藏本题
Why does the author mention that "it took only 100 million years to build the terrestrial planets"?

A. To argue that collisions alone cannot explain the formation of the terrestrial planets

B. To demonstrate a similarity between the formation of the terrestrial planets and the formation of the outer planets

C. To illustrate how the accretion process works faster at higher densities

D. To suggest that the density of gas and dust in the protoplanetary disk was higher than previously thought

我的答案 C 正确答案 C

本题用时3s
  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 题目讨论
  • 标签
    0 感谢 1 不懂
    解析

    【答案】C

    【题型】修辞目的题

    【解析】题干论据为 “形成类地行星仅仅需要一亿年”,所在定位句的前半部分“the density was high”与该论据用and连接形成顺承关系,论据对前半句无法构成解释说明。定位句整句说的就是“在前太阳系盘面的内部密度很高,所以形成类地行星用时短”。并且这一句谈论的inner part和后一句讲“outer planets”构成对比,后句无法再给答案了,所以这题的论点应该在首句里找。首句说到 “堆积过程的时间取决于密度,因为高密度意味着更频繁的碰撞。” 后一句则开始举例说明“高密度的地方形成类地行星只用了一亿年”。对应原文首句含义的只有选项C:为了论证堆积过程在高密度的地方是如何形成得更快的。

    选项A的论点部分强调的是“单纯的碰撞不能解释类地行星的形成”,否定含义未提及。

    选项B的论点部分为“类地行星和外部行星构成的相同点”,与原文相反,原文将两者进行对比强调的是两者的构成不同。

    选项D的论点部分为“protoplanetary disk中的气体与灰尘密度要比原先认为的更高”,虚假比较原文未提及。

    综上答案为C。

  • 题目讨论

    如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。

译文
Planetary Formation

According to the condensation theory of planet formation, planets form out of a spinning disk of gas that surrounds a newborn star known as a protoplanetary disk. The disk and star both originate in a rotating, collapsing cloud of material, and this process of collapse produces different abundances of materials in the disk at different distances from the star. In the higher temperature regions, comparable to the region around the planet Mercury in our solar system, the only kinds of material that can condense from the gas to the solid state (in this case, microscopic dust grains) are metals. Farther out, about where Venus, Earth, and Mars are now, the gas temperatures are lower. At these distances and temperatures, rocky materials such as silicates can also begin to form dust grains. Even farther out, the temperature gets low enough for water ice to form, and even farther from the star, ices of other compounds such as ammonia and methane can condense. But how do young planetary systems go from making dust grains to making planets?

/

"The answer to that question, "explains astronomer David Jewitt, "is a process called binary accretion, where collisions between pairs of objects let larger and larger structures get put together. Collisions between grains, which are small and sticky, quickly lead to the construction of pebbles. Collisions between pebbles lead to rocks. Collisions between rocks lead to boulders. Collisions between boulders lead to planetesimals, rocky bodies the size of asteroids (bodies that orbit between Mars and Jupiter and range in size up to about 1,000 kilometers). If this accretion process happens far enough from the star, significant quantities of ices will be included in the planetesimals. This is the likely origin of comets. Eventually, the objects are large enough for gravity to begin compressing and heating the planetesimal interiors. As planetesimals grow even larger, gravity pulls them into a spherical shape, and the heaviest elements sink to the center of the body. Iron and nickel will, in this way, form the dense metallic cores of the young planets. Eventually, full-sized terrestrial planets, the rocky cores of gas giants(such as Jupiter and Saturn), and moons are formed through the accretion process.

The timescale for the accretion process depends on the density of gas and dust in the protoplanetary disk, because higher densities mean more frequent collisions. In the inner part of our pre-solar system disk, the density was high, and it took only 100 million years to build the terrestrial planets. The formation of the outer planets is a more complicated story, and scientists are still not sure how the gas and ice giants formed. "There are basically two models for the formation of giant planets like Jupiter, says Jewitt. In the first model, an icy terrestrial planet grows by binary accretion up to a mass about 5-10 times that of Earth, at which point new process begins. "When that small core planet reaches the critical mass, "Jewitt explains, "it has enough gravity to start pulling in gas from the surrounding disk. You get very rapid flow of gas onto this core, taking the planet all the way up to Jupiter's or Saturn's mass." This idea is called the core accretion model. According to Jewitt among most solar system astronomers the core accretion model is the preferred idea for the formation of the large gas planets Jupiter and Saturn. The problem with the core accretion theory for these particular planets is that building up the rocky center takes an exceedingly long time. Near the end of the accretion phase, the disk begins losing its gas content when radiation from the Sun causes it to disperse. If the gas disperses before the core has a chance to reach its critical mass, the idea cannot work. That is why astronomers have developed a second theory, called the hydrodynamic instability model. This begins with an enormous disk of gas that collapses in on itself due to the influence of its own gravity. Just as the star and its disk were formed from a gravitationally unstable cloud, some astronomers claim that planets form from the gravitational collapse of gas within the disk itself. "Parts of the disk would just contract under their own gravity, says Jewitt. "The planets would form directly without needing a core.