托福阅读新真经模考一

分享小红书,免费领会员
Font Size: 默认
  • Font Size:默认
  • Font Size:14px
  • Font Size:20px
  • Font Size:16px
  • Font Size:18px

Question 10 of 10

收藏本题
Directions: An introductory sentence for a brief summary of the passage is provided below. Complete the summary by selecting the THREE answer choices that express the most important ideas in the passage. Some sentences do not belong in the summary because they express ideas that are not presented in the passage or are minor ideas in the passage. This question is worth 2 points.

Answer Chiose:

A. A star is formed when clouds of material rotating in space collapse, and planets are formed from the different materials that condense from a disk of gas spinning around the star.

B. In a process called binary accretion, pairs of objects collide to form ever larger objects, and this occurs faster in places where the density of the protoplanetary material is higher.

C. The formation of large gas planets takes place in a region of the protoplanetary disk that contains higher densities of gas than the region where terrestrial planets form.

D. Although the process by which microscopic dust grains form at various places around a star is well understood, the reason that they combine to form larger structures is not.

E. Gas giants may form after a core begins pulling in gas from the disk, or they may form when a portion of the disk collapses in on itself due to gravity.

F. Most solar system astronomers have come to accept the hydrodynamic instability model over the condensation theory as an explanation for planet formation.

The condensation theory explains planet formation to some extent, but questions about the process remain.

我的答案:ABE 正确答案:ABE

本题用时3s
  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 题目讨论
  • 标签
    0 感谢 0 不懂
    解析

    【答案】ABE

    【题型】文章内容小结题

    【解析】该题的黑体句意思为“凝结理论一定程度上可以解释行星的形成,但是关于形成过程还有很多问题”。这篇文章一共只有三个段落,遇到这类段落数量较少的文章,一定要更加注意段内的层次。第一段主要说的是condensation theory,第二段重点讲了binary accretion,以及具体的形成过程。文章的第三段很长,提到了类地行星和其他外部行星两层,并且关于外部行星的形成说到了两个理论模型的对比。

    选项A正确,对应了原文第一段的内容,并且前面第二题也涉及到了这部分信息。

    选项B正确,前半句对应原文第二段的内容,描述了物质如何通过碰撞变得越来越大,后半句对应第三段的前两句内容。

    选项C错误,虚假比较逻辑原文未提及,并且原文第三段的前两句也说明了密度越高,形成速度越快,选项与原文相反。

    选项D错误,microscopic dust grains是原文第一段句子简化题里面非常次要的信息,并且原文也未提及“well understood”以及后半句的否定含义。

    选项E正确,对应了原文第三段后半部分提到的两个理论模型。

    选项F错误,hydrodynamic instability model对应第三段最后,但是原文未提及绝对词 most astronomers。

  • 题目讨论

    如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。

译文
Planetary Formation

According to the condensation theory of planet formation, planets form out of a spinning disk of gas that surrounds a newborn star known as a protoplanetary disk. The disk and star both originate in a rotating, collapsing cloud of material, and this process of collapse produces different abundances of materials in the disk at different distances from the star. In the higher temperature regions, comparable to the region around the planet Mercury in our solar system, the only kinds of material that can condense from the gas to the solid state (in this case, microscopic dust grains) are metals. Farther out, about where Venus, Earth, and Mars are now, the gas temperatures are lower. At these distances and temperatures, rocky materials such as silicates can also begin to form dust grains. Even farther out, the temperature gets low enough for water ice to form, and even farther from the star, ices of other compounds such as ammonia and methane can condense. But how do young planetary systems go from making dust grains to making planets?

/

"The answer to that question, "explains astronomer David Jewitt, "is a process called binary accretion, where collisions between pairs of objects let larger and larger structures get put together. Collisions between grains, which are small and sticky, quickly lead to the construction of pebbles. Collisions between pebbles lead to rocks. Collisions between rocks lead to boulders. Collisions between boulders lead to planetesimals, rocky bodies the size of asteroids (bodies that orbit between Mars and Jupiter and range in size up to about 1,000 kilometers). If this accretion process happens far enough from the star, significant quantities of ices will be included in the planetesimals. This is the likely origin of comets. Eventually, the objects are large enough for gravity to begin compressing and heating the planetesimal interiors. As planetesimals grow even larger, gravity pulls them into a spherical shape, and the heaviest elements sink to the center of the body. Iron and nickel will, in this way, form the dense metallic cores of the young planets. Eventually, full-sized terrestrial planets, the rocky cores of gas giants(such as Jupiter and Saturn), and moons are formed through the accretion process.

The timescale for the accretion process depends on the density of gas and dust in the protoplanetary disk, because higher densities mean more frequent collisions. In the inner part of our pre-solar system disk, the density was high, and it took only 100 million years to build the terrestrial planets. The formation of the outer planets is a more complicated story, and scientists are still not sure how the gas and ice giants formed. "There are basically two models for the formation of giant planets like Jupiter, says Jewitt. In the first model, an icy terrestrial planet grows by binary accretion up to a mass about 5-10 times that of Earth, at which point new process begins. "When that small core planet reaches the critical mass, "Jewitt explains, "it has enough gravity to start pulling in gas from the surrounding disk. You get very rapid flow of gas onto this core, taking the planet all the way up to Jupiter's or Saturn's mass." This idea is called the core accretion model. According to Jewitt among most solar system astronomers the core accretion model is the preferred idea for the formation of the large gas planets Jupiter and Saturn. The problem with the core accretion theory for these particular planets is that building up the rocky center takes an exceedingly long time. Near the end of the accretion phase, the disk begins losing its gas content when radiation from the Sun causes it to disperse. If the gas disperses before the core has a chance to reach its critical mass, the idea cannot work. That is why astronomers have developed a second theory, called the hydrodynamic instability model. This begins with an enormous disk of gas that collapses in on itself due to the influence of its own gravity. Just as the star and its disk were formed from a gravitationally unstable cloud, some astronomers claim that planets form from the gravitational collapse of gas within the disk itself. "Parts of the disk would just contract under their own gravity, says Jewitt. "The planets would form directly without needing a core.