托福阅读新真经模考一

分享小红书,免费领会员
Font Size: 默认
  • Font Size:默认
  • Font Size:14px
  • Font Size:20px
  • Font Size:16px
  • Font Size:18px

Question 8 of 10

收藏本题
According to paragraph 3, the hydrodynamic instability model was introduced to address which of the following weaknesses in the core accretion theory?

A. A gas giant with a rocky core would produce so much radiation that it would cause the gas around it to disperse.

B. Disks of gas are too gravitationally unstable to produce a gas giant.

C. The surrounding disk of gas would not contain enough rocky material to form the core of a gas giant.

D. The Sun's radiation would disperse the gas of the protoplanetary disk before a gas giant could fully form its rocky core.

Paragraph 3 is marked with []

我的答案 D 正确答案 D

本题用时3s
  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 题目讨论
  • 标签
    0 感谢 0 不懂
    解析

    【答案】D

    【题型】事实信息题

    【解析】题干隐含了比较逻辑,问的是 “the hydrodynamic instability model” 理论二的提出,是为了解决 “core accretion theory”理论一的什么弊端。答案需要找的就是“core accretion theory”相比于理论二有啥问题,注意负面方向,所以定位需要从“The problem with the core accretion theory...”开始。直到“That is why astronomers have developed a second theory...”,这句已经隐含了与前一句的关系,也就是提出理论二的原因就是该句“that”所指代的前一句内容。所以重点理解 “If the gas disperses before the core has a chance to reach its critical mass, the idea cannot work.” 也就是说,如果在核心有机会达到它的临界质量之前,气体就扩散了,那上面的理论就行不通了。根据这部分信息对应答案D:在气体巨星完全形成岩石核心之前,太阳辐射可能会使气体扩散。

    选项A,有岩石核心的气体巨星会产生大量辐射,导致周围的气体扩散。错误,原文说的是太阳形成的辐射导致气体扩散。

    选项B,气体的圆盘引力太不稳,所以不能产生气体巨星。原文未提及,且gravitationally unstable是理论二里的内容,定位范围也不对。

    选项C,周围的气体圆盘没有足够的岩石物质来形成气体巨星的岩石核心,原文未提及。

    综上答案为D。

  • 题目讨论

    如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。

译文
Planetary Formation

According to the condensation theory of planet formation, planets form out of a spinning disk of gas that surrounds a newborn star known as a protoplanetary disk. The disk and star both originate in a rotating, collapsing cloud of material, and this process of collapse produces different abundances of materials in the disk at different distances from the star. In the higher temperature regions, comparable to the region around the planet Mercury in our solar system, the only kinds of material that can condense from the gas to the solid state (in this case, microscopic dust grains) are metals. Farther out, about where Venus, Earth, and Mars are now, the gas temperatures are lower. At these distances and temperatures, rocky materials such as silicates can also begin to form dust grains. Even farther out, the temperature gets low enough for water ice to form, and even farther from the star, ices of other compounds such as ammonia and methane can condense. But how do young planetary systems go from making dust grains to making planets?

/

"The answer to that question, "explains astronomer David Jewitt, "is a process called binary accretion, where collisions between pairs of objects let larger and larger structures get put together. Collisions between grains, which are small and sticky, quickly lead to the construction of pebbles. Collisions between pebbles lead to rocks. Collisions between rocks lead to boulders. Collisions between boulders lead to planetesimals, rocky bodies the size of asteroids (bodies that orbit between Mars and Jupiter and range in size up to about 1,000 kilometers). If this accretion process happens far enough from the star, significant quantities of ices will be included in the planetesimals. This is the likely origin of comets. Eventually, the objects are large enough for gravity to begin compressing and heating the planetesimal interiors. As planetesimals grow even larger, gravity pulls them into a spherical shape, and the heaviest elements sink to the center of the body. Iron and nickel will, in this way, form the dense metallic cores of the young planets. Eventually, full-sized terrestrial planets, the rocky cores of gas giants(such as Jupiter and Saturn), and moons are formed through the accretion process.

The timescale for the accretion process depends on the density of gas and dust in the protoplanetary disk, because higher densities mean more frequent collisions. In the inner part of our pre-solar system disk, the density was high, and it took only 100 million years to build the terrestrial planets. The formation of the outer planets is a more complicated story, and scientists are still not sure how the gas and ice giants formed. "There are basically two models for the formation of giant planets like Jupiter, says Jewitt. In the first model, an icy terrestrial planet grows by binary accretion up to a mass about 5-10 times that of Earth, at which point new process begins. "When that small core planet reaches the critical mass, "Jewitt explains, "it has enough gravity to start pulling in gas from the surrounding disk. You get very rapid flow of gas onto this core, taking the planet all the way up to Jupiter's or Saturn's mass." This idea is called the core accretion model. According to Jewitt among most solar system astronomers the core accretion model is the preferred idea for the formation of the large gas planets Jupiter and Saturn. The problem with the core accretion theory for these particular planets is that building up the rocky center takes an exceedingly long time. Near the end of the accretion phase, the disk begins losing its gas content when radiation from the Sun causes it to disperse. If the gas disperses before the core has a chance to reach its critical mass, the idea cannot work. That is why astronomers have developed a second theory, called the hydrodynamic instability model. This begins with an enormous disk of gas that collapses in on itself due to the influence of its own gravity. Just as the star and its disk were formed from a gravitationally unstable cloud, some astronomers claim that planets form from the gravitational collapse of gas within the disk itself. "Parts of the disk would just contract under their own gravity, says Jewitt. "The planets would form directly without needing a core.