Pottery developed much earlier in Japan than in Europe and western Asia.
我的笔记 编辑笔记
The oldest known pottery in the world comes from Japan, and is known as Jomon, which means "cord marks", after its typical decorations made by impressing cords into the wet clay. The earliest Jomon pottery is dated to around 14,000 B.C., considerably earlier than any pottery produced in Europe and western Asia, the earliest of which dates to approximately 8,000 B.C.
Why should the Jomon people have been so inventive? Why were they making pottery so much earlier than anywhere else in the world? Only pottery from China comes remotely close to it in date, and there it is explained by the requirements of rice cultivation. Melvin Aikens, an authority on the Jomon period, believes that Japanese pottery was invented to cook and store the produce of the thick broad-leaved woodlands that had already covered Kyushu, Japan's southernmost main island, by 13,000 B.C. The relationship is evident, he argues, from the simultaneous spread of broad-leaved woodlands and pottery into the northern islands of Japan, both appearing on the northernmost island of Hokkaido at around 7,000 B.C.
There are,however, two problems with this idea. First, there is no necessity for hunter-gatherers to have pottery when living in wooded environments-the inhabitants of other villages of this era, such as Ain Mallaha in western Asia at 12,500 B.C. and Star Carr in northern Europe at 9, 500 B.C., flourished by relying entirely on vessels made from bark, skins, wood, and stone. Pottery no doubt made life easier for those who did the cooking in the woodlands of Kyushu, and we know from food residues that pottery vessels had indeed been used to make vegetable, meat, and fish stews. But people could have easily survived without such vessels.
A second problem for Aikens'theory arose in 1999 when a new sample of pottery was found in northern Honshu(Japan's largest island). Radiocarbon dates on the residues stuck to the interior of the pot dated to 14, 500 B.C., pushing back the origin of pottery by at least another thousand years. At this date Honshu would have had no more than a sparse covering of pine trees. And so the theory that Japanese pottery was invented to store and cook the produce of broad-leaved woodlands cannot be correct.
An archaeologist, Brian Hayden, has proposed an alternative explanation. It provides another example of his belief in social competition as the driving force of social change that he applied in explaining the origin of squash cultivation in Mexico. Hayden suggests that ceramic vessels have a number of important qualities that make them prestigious objects to own and ideal containers for serving food to guests. At the outset, the potter's art would have been difficult to master; clay had to be carefully selected, tempers (materials added to clay to reduce its plasticity)prepared, and construction and firing techniques explored, practiced, and refined. Neighbors and other visitors would have been struck with the amount of labor and skill required to produce a pottery vessel. The display of novel forms with fancy decoration would have impressed them even more. Most striking of all might have been the dramatic smashing of vessels during feasts as an ostentatious display of wealth.
Theatrical smashing of pots may have occurred in the later Jomon period, as immense piles of broken pottery have been found. And as they come in astonishingly elaborate forms, there can be no doubt that many later Jomon vessels were primarily for display. They have spectacular rims modeled as licking flames or serpents winding around the vessel. Sometimes the decoration is so top-heavy that the pots can hardly stand alone. Lacquered (glossy) objects must have been very striking. But we must be cautious about applying such interpretations to the earliest and rather dull specimens of pottery. We currently know too little about the very earliest pottery makers of Japan to decide whether they had been more concerned with impressing their visitors or devising a means to cook vegetable stew. We do know, however, that by 9, 500B.C. many were living sedentary lives in permanent settlements. Although pottery had already been invented, the sedentary lifestyle must have been crucial in enabling ceramic technology to flourish.
暂无译文
【题型】总结题
【解析】
已经给出的句子意思是 “在日本发现的陶器要比在欧洲和西亚发现的历史更悠久。”整个文章也是围绕“为什么日本的陶器要比其他地区发明得要更早”做出讨论。
第二段先提出了Aikens的理论,他认为日本的Jomon陶器是为储存和烹饪阔叶林地的农作物而发明的。
第三段和第四段分别提出了Aikens理论存在的两个问题。第一个问题,当时狩猎采集者没有必要使用陶器,因为同时期其他地区的人们就是完全依赖其他材质的器皿,没有使用陶器也一样能繁荣发展。第二个问题是,在1999年,当时在本州岛北部发现了一个新的陶器。通过放射性碳测定粘在罐子内部的残留物,时间可以追溯到公元前14500年。在这个时候,本州只有稀疏的松树。因此,日本发明陶器是为了储存和烹饪阔叶林地农作物的理论是不正确的。
第五段和第六段提出了另一种不同的解释。Hayden认为,陶瓷有许多重要的特质,不仅被有声望的人拥有,也是为客人提供食物的理想容器。最引人注目的可能是在宴会上戏剧性地砸碎器皿,以炫耀财富。戏剧性地砸碎陶器可能发生在Jomom时代后期,因为发现了大量破碎的陶器。但是由于对日本最早的陶器制作者知之甚少,所以无法判断他们当时是更关心给访客留下深刻印象,还是发明一种煮蔬菜的方法。然而,我们确切知道的是,在公元前9500年,许多人在永久定居点过着定居的生活。尽管陶器已经被发明了,但定居的生活方式对陶瓷技术的蓬勃发展依然至关重要。
综合文章的内容分析:
A. 陶器的发明是为了烹饪和储存阔叶林地的产品,这一观点没有得到现有证据的支持。正确。
B. 早期Jomon陶器可能被用来盛放食物,而发现的大量带有精心装饰的破碎陶器表明,后来的陶器也被用来展示财富。正确。
C. 虽然陶器是由狩猎和采集人口发明的,但随着人们开始在永久定居点定居生活,它得到了极大的发展。 正确。
D和E 与原文不符,F 文章没有提及,所以都排除。
如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。