Click on an oval to select your answer. To choose a different answer,
click one different oval.
我的笔记 编辑笔记
The arctic fox has lived in the Scandinavian countries of Norway, Finland, and Sweden since the last Ice Age, which ended more than10,000 years ago. Today, however, the arctic fox in Scandinavia is in severe trouble. Despite intense conservation efforts, its numbers have been radically declining. Why this most resourceful of species has been unable to rebound since hunting was prohibited is not altogether clear.
One possibility is that the animals have gone through what biologists refer to as a population bottleneck. Such bottlenecks occur when the number of animals in a given population is reduced to the point where inbreeding enables the enhanced proliferation of genes that may be detrimental to a species' overall fitness (ability to survive). A related hypothesis is that the arctic foxes had lost their genetic advantage owing to the spread of genes from selectively bred foxes that escaped from farms. Captive-raised foxes are known to have escaped, and recent genetic studies from Norway have shown that such interbreeding between farm-bred foxes and foxes in the wild has indeed taken place. While these results are being viewed as potential future trouble, there is still no indication that they explain past difficulties. The number of crossover genes detected in the Norwegian study was small, suggesting that mixing between wild and escaped foxes is a recent occurrence.
Among changes in the environment that might be to blame, one of the earliest ideas relates to the absence of wolves, animals that for thousands of years filled the role of top predator throughout Scandinavia but that disappeared from most of Norway and Sweden during the twentieth century after hundreds of years of persecution. There is no winter sea ice along the coastlines of Norway and western Russia, as there is throughout the Canadian Arctic and off the coast of Siberia, meaning the arctic foxes in this part of the world have no access to remains of polar bears' prey, an important source of food for arctic foxes. What they do have access to is reindeer. Since wolves are the only predator of reindeer in Scandinavia, it has been argued that the elimination of the wolf has led to a decline in the availability of a necessary winter food supply.
Scientists, however, have been unable to uncover any strong evidence to support the claim that arctic foxes are suffering because of the absence of large predators. One study even suggests arctic foxes do better in the absence of large predators because when animals such as reindeer die of natural causes, the foxes have the large carcasses all to themselves. Also casting doubt on the wolf's culpability is the fact that it had been hunted out of many alpine regions of Scandinavia during the mid-nineteenth century, long before the arctic fox entered into its decline. What's now known about wolf biology suggests the amount of meat and entrails (internal organs) left behind by these animals may not be sufficient to have a noticeable impact on the arctic fox population.
Today there is little enthusiasm among arctic fox scientists for the idea that a lack of wolves is to blame. Instead, most now believe the trouble stems from the increased presence of another canine carnivore- one that, in the eyes of the arctic fox at least, is far more ferocious: the red fox. The red fox is one of the most successful carnivores anywhere. It has evolved a repertoire of instincts that has enabled it to thrive in a world increasingly dominated by humans and human-altered landscapes.
For the most part, arctic foxes and red foxes occupy different environmental niches. Generally the arctic fox keeps to the tundra, while the red fox is at home in a wide range of habitats throughout the northern hemisphere. In recent decades, however, there is evidence that red foxes are increasingly encroaching on what previously had been territory inhabited only by arctic foxes. During the nineteenth century, there were occasional red fox sightings on southern Baffin Island in Canada, but none of the animals were known to settle down and breed. In the last half of the twentieth century, however, they returned and became a permanent population there.
暂无译文
【答案】B
【题型】事实信息题
【解析】题干问的是科学家为什么认为野生狐和逃逸狐的杂交无法解释过去的困难,根据关键词“mixing"和 “past difficulties"定位到第二段最后两句,意思是虽然这些结果被视为未来的潜在麻烦,但是依旧无法说明它们能解释过去的困难。挪威研究里发现的交叉基因数量少,这意味着二者的杂交是最近才出现的。选项B讲的就是因为混合基因特别少,所以很可能最近才出现,跟第二段最后一句内容一致。
选项A的意思是,没有证据表明两种狐狸杂交了,跟第二段倒数第三句相反。
选项C的意思是,逃逸狐的数量依然很少,跟定位句内容不符,定位句说的是交叉基因特别少。
选项D的意思是,引入交叉基因通常会给物种带来基因优势,第二段没有提到这个普遍规律。
如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。