Click on an oval to select your answer. To choose a different answer,
click one different oval.
我的笔记 编辑笔记
The arctic fox has lived in the Scandinavian countries of Norway, Finland, and Sweden since the last Ice Age, which ended more than10,000 years ago. Today, however, the arctic fox in Scandinavia is in severe trouble. Despite intense conservation efforts, its numbers have been radically declining. Why this most resourceful of species has been unable to rebound since hunting was prohibited is not altogether clear.
One possibility is that the animals have gone through what biologists refer to as a population bottleneck. Such bottlenecks occur when the number of animals in a given population is reduced to the point where inbreeding enables the enhanced proliferation of genes that may be detrimental to a species' overall fitness (ability to survive). A related hypothesis is that the arctic foxes had lost their genetic advantage owing to the spread of genes from selectively bred foxes that escaped from farms. Captive-raised foxes are known to have escaped, and recent genetic studies from Norway have shown that such interbreeding between farm-bred foxes and foxes in the wild has indeed taken place. While these results are being viewed as potential future trouble, there is still no indication that they explain past difficulties. The number of crossover genes detected in the Norwegian study was small, suggesting that mixing between wild and escaped foxes is a recent occurrence.
Among changes in the environment that might be to blame, one of the earliest ideas relates to the absence of wolves, animals that for thousands of years filled the role of top predator throughout Scandinavia but that disappeared from most of Norway and Sweden during the twentieth century after hundreds of years of persecution. There is no winter sea ice along the coastlines of Norway and western Russia, as there is throughout the Canadian Arctic and off the coast of Siberia, meaning the arctic foxes in this part of the world have no access to remains of polar bears' prey, an important source of food for arctic foxes. What they do have access to is reindeer. Since wolves are the only predator of reindeer in Scandinavia, it has been argued that the elimination of the wolf has led to a decline in the availability of a necessary winter food supply.
Scientists, however, have been unable to uncover any strong evidence to support the claim that arctic foxes are suffering because of the absence of large predators. One study even suggests arctic foxes do better in the absence of large predators because when animals such as reindeer die of natural causes, the foxes have the large carcasses all to themselves. Also casting doubt on the wolf's culpability is the fact that it had been hunted out of many alpine regions of Scandinavia during the mid-nineteenth century, long before the arctic fox entered into its decline. What's now known about wolf biology suggests the amount of meat and entrails (internal organs) left behind by these animals may not be sufficient to have a noticeable impact on the arctic fox population.
Today there is little enthusiasm among arctic fox scientists for the idea that a lack of wolves is to blame. Instead, most now believe the trouble stems from the increased presence of another canine carnivore- one that, in the eyes of the arctic fox at least, is far more ferocious: the red fox. The red fox is one of the most successful carnivores anywhere. It has evolved a repertoire of instincts that has enabled it to thrive in a world increasingly dominated by humans and human-altered landscapes.
For the most part, arctic foxes and red foxes occupy different environmental niches. Generally the arctic fox keeps to the tundra, while the red fox is at home in a wide range of habitats throughout the northern hemisphere. In recent decades, however, there is evidence that red foxes are increasingly encroaching on what previously had been territory inhabited only by arctic foxes. During the nineteenth century, there were occasional red fox sightings on southern Baffin Island in Canada, but none of the animals were known to settle down and breed. In the last half of the twentieth century, however, they returned and became a permanent population there.
暂无译文
【答案】C
【题型】事实信息题
【解析】题干问的是,有观点认为狼的缺席减少了北极狐的食物供应,下面哪个选项是对该观点的有力反驳?根据关键词“food”定位到最后一句,意思是,狼留下的肉和内脏不够多,不足以对北极狐的数量产生显著影响,也就是说,有没有狼并不是一个重要的影响因素,对北极狐的食物来源没有明显影响,能回答题干的问题。C选项的意思是,狼在杀死驯鹿后不会留下很多东西,跟定位句内容一致。
选项A的意思是,在狼被捕猎出很多地区之前,北极狐的数量就已经开始下降了,而原文第三句讲的是,在北极狐数量开始下降之前,狼就已经被捕猎了,选项A说反了。
选项B的意思是,北极狐留下的肉和内脏如何,描述主体就错了,原文讲的是狼留下的肉和内脏,张冠李戴。
选项D的意思是,因为狼和北极狐吃的食物不同,所以狼的缺席不会影响北极狐的食物供应,原文没有提及这个原因。
如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。