纠错
置顶

Formation of the Solar System

纠错

According to paragraph 2, which of the following statements about the eighteenth-century theory of the origin of the solar system is true?

Click on an oval to select your answer. To choose a different answer,

click one different oval.

  • A
    lt was based on similarities in the movement of planets.
  • B
    lt developed out of an intense competition between Kant and Laplace.
  • C
    lt proposed that the Sun had a different origin than the planets, satellites, asteroids, and comets.
  • D
    lt was no longer accepted after some modern theories were proposed.
显示答案
正确答案: A

我的笔记 编辑笔记

  • 原文
  • 译文
  • Where did the solar system come from? This question has tantalized astronomers for centuries. While we do not yet have a wholly complete answer, a consensus has arisen about the most likely series of events that led to the present-day system of the Sun and planets.



    A key piece of evidence about the origin of the solar system is that all the planets orbit the Sun in the same direction and in nearly the same plane. As long ago as the eighteenth century, German philosopher Immanuel Kant and French scientist Pierre-Simon de Laplace independently suggested that this state of affairs could not be a coincidence. They proposed that our entire solar system-the Sun as well as all of the planets, satellites, asteroids, and comets—formed from a vast, rotating cloud of gas and dust called the solar nebula. ln the modern version of their theory, the solar nebula is thought to have had a mass somewhat greater than that of our present-day Sun.



    Each part of the nebula exerted a gravitational attraction on the other parts, and these mutual gravitational pulls tended to make the nebula contract. As it contracted, the greatest concentration of matter occurred at the center of the nebula, forming a relatively dense region called the protosun, which eventually developed into the Sun. The planets formed from the much lesser amount of material in the outer regions of the solar nebula. Indeed, the mass of all the planets together is only 0.1 percent of the mass of the Sun.



    When you drop a ball, the gravitational attraction of Earth makes the ball travel faster and faster as it falls; in the same way, material falling inward toward the protosun would have gained speed. As this fast-moving material ran into the protosun, the energy of the collision was converted into thermal energy, causing the temperature deep inside the solar nebula to climb. While the protosun's surface temperature stayed roughly constant, the temperature inside the protosun increased even more by means of further contraction. Eventually, after perhaps 100 million years had passed since the solar nebula first began to contract, the central temperature of the protosun reached a few million degrees, and nuclear reactions began in its interior. When this happened, the contraction stopped and a true star(the Sun) was born. Nuclear reactions in the interior of the present-day Sun are the source of all the energy that the Sun radiates into space.



    lf the solar nebula had not been rotating at all, everything would have fallen directly into the protosun, leaving nothing behind to form the planets. Instead, the solar nebula must have had an overall slight rotation, which caused its evolution to follow a different path. As the slowly rotating nebula collapsed inward, it would naturally have tended to rotate faster. Figure skaters use this same phenomenon; when a spinning figure skater pulls her arms and legs inward, close to her body, the rate at which she spins automatically increases. As the solar nebula began to rotate more rapidly, it also tended to flatten out, just as a spinning ball of dough flattens out when it is spun rapidly by a pizza chef. The eventual result was a structure with a rotating flattened disk surrounding a newly formed Sun. The planets formed later from this disk, which explains why their orbits all lie in essentially the same plane and why they all orbit the Sun in the same direction.



    Naturally, there were no humans to observe these processes taking place during the formation of our solar system. But astronomers have seen disks of material surrounding other stars that formed only recently. These are called protoplanetary disks, or proplyds, because it is thought that planets can eventually form from these disks around other stars. By studying these proplyds, astronomers are able to examine what our solar nebula may have been like some 5 billion years ago.


  • 暂无译文

  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 标签
    1 感谢 不懂
    解析

    【题型】事实信息题

    【解析】题干问的是:根据第 2 段,下列关于十八世纪太阳系起源理论的说法,哪一个是正确的?根据题干the origin of the solar system定位到段首句:关于太阳系起源的一个关键证据是,所有的行星都在同一个方向和几乎同一个平面上绕太阳公转,对应A选项。

    B选项,意思是它产生于康德和拉普拉斯之间的激烈竞争。原文第二句As long ago as the eighteenth century, German philosopher Immanuel Kant and French scientist Pierre-Simon de Laplace independently suggested that this state of affairs could not be a coincidence. 明确说明了这两个人是independently suggested独立提出,并没有任何激烈竞争。B与原文相悖,排除。

    C选项,意思是太阳的起源与行星、卫星、小行星和彗星不同。原文倒数第二句They proposed that our entire solar system-the Sun as well as all of the planets, satellites, asteroids, and comets—formed from a vast, rotating cloud of gas and dust called the solar nebula.“他们提出,我们的整个太阳系——太阳以及所有的行星、卫星、小行星和彗星——是由一个巨大的旋转的气体和尘埃云形成的,称为太阳星云。”,明确说明了太阳以及所有的行星、卫星、小行星和彗星的的形成一样,C选项与原文相反,排除。

    D选项,意思是在一些现代理论被提出后,它(十八世纪太阳系起源理论)不再被接受。是原文未提及信息,排除。

题目讨论

如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。

最新提问