机经真题 5 Passage 1

纠错
置顶

Labor Supply for British Industrialization

纠错

According to paragraph 2, which of the following was a reason that landholdings became consolidated during the enclosure movement?

Click on an oval to select your answer. To choose a different answer,

click one different oval.

  • A
    The British parliament wanted to reduce the economic power of landowners involved in commercial agriculture.
  • B
    Small-property owners could not afford to put hedges on their properties.
  • C
    The British parliament required small-property owners to grow crops that were sometimes unsuitable for their land.
  • D
    Urban industrialists purchased large estates in neighboring regions to grow crops and livestock to sell in urban markets.
显示答案
正确答案: B

我的笔记 编辑笔记

  • 原文
  • 译文


  • The Industrial Revolution, which transformed world history, began in Britain in the mid-to-late eighteenth century. Entire industries, most notably cotton spinning, were converted to factory production, and a wave of people moved to the cities for work opportunities. By around 1850, half the population of Britain was urban, and the factory working class had become as large as the craft worker population. Bleak working conditions prevailed in early factories. Employers worked actively to keep labor costs down. Machines raised productivity, simplifying work for many employees and reducing strength and skill requirements, but the gains could be wiped away if other costs rose too rapidly. The machines cost substantial amounts of money for manufacturers, who did not usually come from highly wealthy backgrounds; there was pressure to make sure the investments paid off quickly. This meant, typically, not only relatively low pay for workers but also long hours at work (most factories assumed twelve-to-fourteen-hour work days). Other work conditions-more intensive control by sometimes harsh supervisors, a machine-driven pace on the job-were often unfavorable as well. The question that often arises is why so many laborers were attracted to industrial jobs. Historians also ask why the Industrial Revolution happened in Britain first, and not, for example, in another place such as Germany or France.



    Historians quickly uncovered a plausible new eighteenth-century element, fairly distinctive to Britain: the growing enclosure movement. During the middle decades of the century, many landowners, seeking to develop larger holdings for exploitation in commercial agriculture, persuaded the British parliament to pass acts (laws) of enclosure, requiring that owners in a particular area enclose their property with hedges (rows of bushes or trees). Small-property owners could not usually afford this expense, which would additionally cut into the land available for agriculture. Many were forced to sell out to larger estates in the region. The results were obvious consolidation (merging) of landholdings in many regions; new opportunities to grow crops or raise livestock for sale in urban markets (itself a crucial backdrop to industrialization, which required an expanding food supply); and new limits on opportunities for work in the countryside. Former peasant farmers, the argument went, were no longer needed in traditional numbers because the new estates were more efficient. Thus, they had no choice but to seek alternative support, mainly by flocking to early industrial cities and hoping they could find work, however unpleasant, in the pioneering factories.



    New questions about the sources of early factory labor arose in part because of more detailed research on the British enclosure movement. There was no doubt that considerable British land was enclosed into large estates during the eighteenth century (after a previous round 200 years before), and the result surely encouraged agricultural innovation. But enclosure did not, the new research demonstrated, reduce the need for agricultural workers, whose numbers did not decline. Only much later would new agricultural machinery achieve that result. These findings also reduced the force of this aspect of the conventional discussion of Britain's industrial lead; British labor supply conditions were less distinctive than had been imagined.



    This turned attention to several related factors. Basic population growth was more important than land redistribution in explaining the availability of labor. British growth levels after 1730 were quite high for several reasons, including the widespread adoption of the potato as an unusually efficient source of food. Enclosure, while it did not reduce agricultural numbers, did limit the ability of farming to absorb more people. But British labor supply (supplemented by Irish immigration) was not particularly unusual at this time-Germany, for example, featured similar growth rates-and there were parts of this region as well where large estates predominated. New population pressures pushed workers off the land in much of Western Europe, creating part of the context for industrialization, with Britain in this regard simply the first of many instances.


  • 暂无译文

  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 标签
    0 感谢 不懂
    解析

    A. 英国议会希望减少参与商业农业的土地所有者的经济权力。这是错误的。段落没有提到英国议会有意图减少这些土地所有者的经济权力,实际情况是这些所有者推动了议会通过圈地法案。

    B. 小产权所有者不能负担在他们的财产上设置围栏的费用。这是正确的。段落中指出:“小产权所有者通常负担不起这种开销,这还会减少可用于农业的土地。许多人不得不把土地卖给该地区的大型地产。”这说明,小产权所有者因为不能负担围栏的费用而不得不将土地卖给较大的地产,从而导致了土地合并。

    C. 英国议会要求小产权所有者种植有时不适合其土地的作物。这是错误的。段落没有提到英国议会要求小产权所有者种植特定作物,只涉及到他们被迫围栏,这样增加了他们的成本。

    D. 城市工业家购买了相邻地区的大型地产,以种植作物和饲养牲畜,在城市市场出售。这是错误的。段落中没有提到城市工业家购买了土地。这段描述的是较大地产业主通过圈地法案迫使小产权所有者出售土地。

题目讨论

如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。

最新提问