【题型】内容主旨题(根据What...mainly about判断)
【思路分析】问讲座主要在讲什么;要结合全文进行选择,注意仔细核对选项信息和同义替换,小心以偏概全的陷阱选项
(female professor) Until recently, our main approach to classifying organisms into groups, their species, genus had been to classify them according to their similar physical features. These classifications have helped us understand how organisms are related in terms of their evolution. Of course, recent breakthroughs in DNA analysis have given us new information about many organisms, causing us to go back and reclassify them. But here's an interesting case where DNA analysis actually supported some previous classifications. Okay, our story starts with Vladimir Nabokov.
【选项分析】
A ×: 原文是在怎么证实一个radical hypothesis是对的,不是推翻一个普遍被接受的假设,排除
B ×: Nabokov没有使用DNA analysis,是后文提到的另一个专家Naomi Pierce使用的,排除
C ✔️: 原文有直接对应的句子(But here's an interesting case where DNA analysis actually supported some previous classifications. Okay, our story starts with Vladimir Nabokov.)后文主要就是讲Nabokov对蝴蝶分类的研究被证实是对的
D ×: 原文主要是讲Nabokov作为taxonomist(分类学者)对蝴蝶分类的研究,不是讲其研究对小说的影响,排除
【题目难度】中