This is Scientific American's 60-Second Science. I'm Wayt Gibbs. Got a minute?
A routine CAT-scan turns up a suspicious spot.
Is it a benign lump? Or a cancerous tumor?
In the case of lung spots, four out of five turn out to be harmless.
Unfortunately, making that determination takes a long needle and a biopsy,
which means a puncture wound in the chest and a risk of infection.
Leroy Hood and colleagues at Seattle's Institute for Systems Biology have devised a painless blood test that could eliminate the need for most biopsies.
They identified 371 proteins that coat lung tumors or leak out of them.
Then they looked at blood samples taken from people who had had lung biopsies.
A pattern emerged: 13 proteins were significantly higher or lower in patients who had lung cancer than in those whose lumps were benign.
The researchers tried the blood test on different patients, and found that when it gave an "all-clear" result, it was correct 90% of the time.
The work appears in the journal Science Translational Medicine.
Indi, a diagnostics maker, is commercializing the blood test.
Hood says the same approach should work for almost any disease,
which could make diagnostics much less prickly.
Thanks for the minute, for Scientific American 60-Second Science. I'm Wayt Gibbs.
如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。
精听听写练习