机经真题 1 Passage 1

纠错
置顶

Dating the Arrival of Humans in North America

纠错

Directions: An introductory sentence for a brief summary of the passage is provided below. Complete the summary by selecting the THREE answer choices that express the most important ideas in the passage. Some sentences do not belong in the summary because they express ideas that are not presented in the passage or are minor ideas in the passage. This question is worth 2 points.   Drag your choices to the spaces where they belong. To review the passage, select View Passage.

Drag your answer choices to the spaces where they belong. To remove an answer choice, click on it.To review the passage, click VIEW TEXT.

Radiocarbon techniques allow for the more exact dating of the movements of glaciers and people in North America.

显示答案
正确答案: A B C
  • A.
    Radiocarbon techniques allow for the more exact dating of the movements of glaciers and people in North America.
  • B.
    Radiocarbon dating has allowed scientists to trace the migration path of the Clovis people into North America by dating the ages of different Clovis sites throughout the continents.
  • C.
    Radiocarbon dating revealed that the Clovis people, who hunted large game with stone points like the Folsom people, lived in North America several hundred years before the Folsom people did.
  • D.
    In contrast to what scientists first believed, hunting cultures such as the Folsom and Clovis people did not thrive in North America until thousands of years after the glaciers had retreated.
  • E.
    Although improper sampling resulted in an incorrect radiocarbon date for the Folsom sample, new samples revealed that Folsom culture was dominant from about 11,000 to 10,000 years B.P.
  • F.
    It appears likely that the Folsom people became the dominant hunters in North America by learning how to make stone points from the Clovis people.

我的笔记 编辑笔记

  • 原文
  • 译文


  • Developed in the mid-twentieth century by Willard Libby and Jim Arnold, radiocarbon dating (used for dating organic materials) brought the chronology of North American prehistory into sharp focus. The method provided accurate ages for the deposits of organic material left behind by the last great ice sheets that covered the continent during the Pleistocene Ice Age that began approximately 1.6 million years ago. One such deposit was determined to be 11,400 years old. Radiocarbon was also used to date the traces (indications of their presence) left by America's earliest human inhabitants, enabling scientists to map out the movements of people and glaciers and to investigate the interrelationships between the two. Libby's first attempts to analyze an ancient North American site included what archaeologists call the Folsom culture.



    Folsom is a small town in northeastern New Mexico. In 1926-1927, arrowhead-like stone points were found there, mixed together with bones from a now-extinct type of bison, a discovery that caused great excitement because it placed humans in New Mexico during the last glacial period. when bison were abundant. Beyond that general observation, however, there was no way to date the site. Eventually, additional "Folsom" sites were discovered in other regions, all characterized by the same distinctive stone points. A few of these were in places that could be correlated with specific glacial deposits, which, through a fairly weak line of reasoning, were thought to be between 10,000 and 25,000 years old. Most workers favored the older end of the range.



    Arnold and Libby included a charcoal sample linked to the Folsom culture in their first published list of radiocarbon dates. The result was a surprise: 4,283 +/- 250 years B.P. (before the present). This was clearly much younger than any of the earlier estimates suggested, and, if the date held up, it would mean that what appeared to be one of the oldest Native American cultures was actually quite recent. Although they were confident about their analysis procedures, Libby and Arnold were suspicious of the result and wondered if the sample had been contaminated with young carbon, or if there was some other difficulty they were unaware of. In the end it turned out to be a classic case of improper sampling, and an example of the importance of careful field documentation. When the charcoal was collected in 1933 (it had been stored away from then until the analysis), it appeared to be lying within a soil layer that contained both animal bones and the distinctive Folsom stone points. But the unexpectedly young age prompted reexamination of the site, and it was determined that the charcoal came from a channel that cut into and through the older layers. Although it appeared to be at the same level as the bones and stone points, it was actually much younger. Once this problem was recognized and new samples from this and other sites were analyzed, it became clear that the most reliable Folsom ages fell in the range of 10,000 to 11,000 B.P.



    However, it was also discovered that Folsom sites are not the oldest evidence for humans in North America. At some localities, slightly different varieties of stone hunting points occur; initially it was thought that these were simply regional variations, or perhaps weapons used for hunting different types of animals. But, in some places-notably at Clovis, New Mexico-they appear in layers that lie beneath the typical Folsom points. This indicated that they were older, and soon archaeologists began to distinguish between Clovis and Folsom cultures. Obviously, Clovis sites became another target for radiocarbon dating, and the results confirmed their antiquity. Clovis sites consistently gave dates that were a few hundred years older than those characterized by the Folsom artifacts, and there seemed to be little or no overlap between the two cultures.



    With these results, the radiocarbon dates of both glacial deposits and archaeological sites in North America seemed to be painting a consistent picture. As the last severe glaciation of the Pleistocene Ice Age lost strength, early people spread into the United States. Clovis people were the first widespread hunters, making distinctive stone points for their weapons and hunting large game such as mammoths. Within a few hundred years, however, a new culture appeared, making smaller and finer stone points and apparently taking over from its Clovis predecessors as the dominant hunters in North America.


  • 暂无译文

  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 标签
    3 感谢 不懂
    解析

    【题型】文章小结题

    【答案】ABC

    【解析】

    这篇文章的主旨是讲“放射性碳测年技术使得对冰川和人类在北美的活动的确切时间的测定成为可能。”

    A. 这个选项提到在Folsom发现的石尖器表明人类在上一个冰川期就生活在北美,但这些石尖器的确切年代曾经是个谜。这个发现为放射性碳测年技术的重要性提供了一个基本背景。与原文相符,正确。

    B. 这个选项直接说明了放射性碳测年技术如何帮助科学家通过测定不同Clovis遗址的年代来追踪Clovis人的迁徙路径。与原文相符,正确。

    C. 这个选项表明放射性碳测年技术揭示了Clovis人比Folsom人更早在北美生活,为理解这些人类活动的时序提供了关键见解。与原文相符,正确。

    D. 这个选项偏离了主题,主要讨论的是猎人文化在冰川退去后很久才兴起,而不是放射性碳测年技术。

    E. 这个选项谈到取样错误和Folsom文化的时间框架,涉及到次要细节,偏离了主要讨论的重点。

    F. 这个选项推测了Folsom人如何成为主要猎人,虽然有一定关系,但并不是主要讨论焦点,且没有直接提到放射性碳测年技术。

题目讨论

如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。

最新提问