Official 08 Passage 2


Extinction of the Dinosaurs


Look at the four squares [] that indicate where the following sentence could be added to the passage. Where would the sentence best fit?

Where would the sentence best fit? Click on a square [] to add the sentence to the passage.

To select a different location,click on a different square.

Consequently, the idea that the Ir in the boundary clay came from microscopic meteorites cannot be accepted.


我的笔记 编辑笔记

  • 原文
  • 译文
  • Paleontologists have argued for a long time that the demise of the dinosaurs was caused by climatic alterations associated with slow changes in the positions of continents and seas resulting from plate tectonics. Off and on throughout the Cretaceous (the last period of the Mesozoic era, during which dinosaurs flourished), large shallow seas covered extensive areas of the continents. Data from diverse sources, including geochemical evidence preserved in seafloor sediments, indicate that the Late Cretaceous climate was milder than today's. The days were not too hot, nor the nights too cold. The summers were not too warm, nor the winters too frigid. The shallow seas on the continents probably buffered the temperature of the nearby air, keeping it relatively constant.

    At the end of the Cretaceous, the geological record shows that these seaways retreated from the continents back into the major ocean basins. No one knows why.Over a period of about 100,000 years, while the seas pulled back, climates around the world became dramatically more extreme: warmer days, cooler nights; hotter summers, colder winters. Perhaps dinosaurs could not tolerate these extreme temperature changes and became extinct.

    If true, though, why did cold-blooded animals such as snakes, lizards, turtles, and crocodiles survive the freezing winters and torrid summers? These animals are at the mercy of the climate to maintain a livable body temperature. It's hard to understand why they would not be affected, whereas dinosaurs were left too crippled to cope, especially if, as some scientists believe, dinosaurs were warm-blooded. Critics also point out that the shallow seaways had retreated from and advanced on the continents numerous times during the Mesozoic, so why did the dinosaurs survive the climatic changes associated with the earlier fluctuations but not with this one? Although initially appealing, the hypothesis of a simple climatic change related to sea levels is insufficient to explain all the data.

    Dissatisfaction with conventional explanations for dinosaur extinctions led to a surprising observation that, in turn, has suggested a new hypothesis. Many plants and animals disappear abruptly from the fossil record as one moves from layers of rock documenting the end of the Cretaceous up into rocks representing the beginning of the Cenozoic (the era after the Mesozoic). Between the last layer of Cretaceous rock and the first layer of Cenozoic rock, there is often a thin layer of clay. Scientists felt that they could get an idea of how long the extinctions took by determining how long it took to deposit this one centimeter of clay and they thought they could determine the time it took to deposit the clay by determining the amount of the element iridium (Ir) it contained.

    Ir has not been common at Earth's since the very beginning of the planet's history. Because it usually exists in a metallic state, it was preferentially incorporated in Earth's core as the planet cooled and consolidated. Ir is found in high concentrations in some meteorites, in which the solar system's original chemical composition is preserved. Even today, microscopic meteorites continually bombard Earth, falling on both land and sea. By measuring how many of these meteorites fall to Earth over a given period of time, scientists can estimate how long it might have taken to deposit the observed amount of Ir in the boundary clay. These calculations suggest that a period of about one million years would have been required. However, other reliable evidence suggests that the deposition of the boundary clay could not have taken one million years. So the unusually high concentration of Ir seems to require a special explanation.

    In view of these facts, scientists hypothesized that a single large asteroid, about 10 to 15 kilometers across, collided with Earth, and the resulting fallout created the boundary clay. Their calculations show that the impact kicked up a dust cloud that cut off sunlight for several months, inhibiting photosynthesis in plants; decreased surface temperatures on continents to below freezing; caused extreme episodes of acid rain; and significantly raised long-term global temperatures through the greenhouse effect. This disruption of food chain and climate would have eradicated the dinosaurs and other organisms in less than fifty years.

  • 很长时间以来,古生物学家们认为恐龙的灭亡是与因地质构造而引起的海洋和大陆位置变迁相关的气候变化所致。在整个白垩纪(中生代的最后的一段时间,这时恐龙正值繁盛),广阔的浅海覆盖了大量的陆地。各方面的数据,包括海床沉积中的地理化学证据,都表明白垩纪后期的气候比现在的气候要温和得多。白天不是很热,夜间也不是很寒冷。夏天不是太炎热,而冬天也不是太寒冷。大陆上的浅海可能使其附近的空气少受影响,以保持相对稳定的温度。

    在白垩纪后期,地质资料表明这些浅海都从大陆退回到主要的海洋盆地内了,没有人明白为什么。大约在100 000年内,海洋收缩了,世界的气候也随之变得更极端:白天更热,夜间更冷,夏天更炎热,冬天更寒冷。恐龙或许就是因为无法忍受这种严峻的气温变化因而灭绝。




  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 标签
    3 感谢 不懂


    题干分析:题干关键词“boundary clay”,“Ir”和因果关联词“consequently”对应相应内容。


    根据“boundary clay”,A、B和C选项都有可能;根据“Ir”,C或D选项可能是答案,所以初定答案是C。A点之后说需要一百万年,B点之后的句子说没有一百万年,所以B前后的转折过渡紧密,B选项排除;而且既然没有一百万年,说明前面的理论不成立,所以待插入句中的consequently插入C的时候因果关系成立,所以C是答案。