机经真题 23 Passage 2

纠错
置顶

Roman Conquests and the European Economy

纠错

Directions: An introductory sentence for a brief summary of the passage is provided below. Complete the summary by selecting the THREE answer choices that express the most important ideas in the passage. Some sentences do not belong in the summary because they express ideas that are not presented in the passage or are minor ideas in the passage. This question is worth 2 points. Drag your choices to the spaces where they belong. To review the passage, select View Passage.

Drag your answer choices to the spaces where they belong. To remove an answer choice, click on it.To review the passage, click VIEW TEXT.

The Roman conquests in Europe had a significant impact on the newly incorporated provinces.

显示答案
正确答案: C D E
  • A.
    The Romans supported the agricultural economies of European tribes with more effective tools and more efficient production of crafts to meet the increasing demands of the aristocracies.
  • B.
    The impact of the Romans in Europe was mostly technological and was marked by the introduction of such manufacturing tools as the potter's wheel, the potter's kiln, and the blast furnace.
  • C.
    The introduction of coins of different values into the economy facilitated the carrying out of almost every transaction required by a monetary economy.
  • D.
    The introduction of the Roman peace helped unify politically divided tribes and transformed the economy in important ways.
  • E.
    Improvements in transportation and social changes based on Roman political and cultural values led to the emergence of cities and the development and growth of industry.
  • F.
    The Romans introduced an elaborate system of taxation in order to encourage the citizenry to appreciate the importance of contributing to the public good from their earnings.

我的笔记 编辑笔记

  • 原文
  • 译文
  • The Roman Empire spent centuries expanding from the Mediterranean throughout Europe, incorporating Britain, Gaul (modern France), Spain, and other areas into the Empire before reaching its height in the first and second centuries C.E. Naturally, Rome's control had a number of effects on the economies of the new provinces. Technologically, Rome was not a great deal more advanced than many of the provinces' native cultures, although the tendency was for the general level of technology to fall as one moved farther from the Mediterranean. Britain, in particular, was surprisingly delayed in some ways; the potter's wheel had only been introduced at the end of the first century B.C.E., although it had been in use in Gaul for the previous four centuries, and the potter's kiln (oven) had arrived even later. Similarly, the shaft furnace used in the Roman heartland for the smelting of metals first appeared in Britain about the time of the Roman conquest. But in other crafts, such as fine metalworking, which were related to the requirements of aristocratic patrons, the native craftsmen were quite as competent as their Roman counterparts.



    Nevertheless, with the incorporation of the new areas into the Empire came a series of fundamentally important changes. Technological changes were probably the least significant, and many of the more important changes operated on industry indirectly. First, there was the Pax Romana, the Roman peace, not universal and not unbroken, but sufficiently intact to convert a normal condition of war to one of peace; the consequences of this alone on the pattern of trade and growth of population and markets were profound. Similarly, what had been a series of divided tribes were now united into single provinces, a fact which over a period of time must have destroyed many of the older cultural barriers to the movement of goods and craftsmen. Although large areas of Europe had shared a basically common culture, they were divided politically into a large number of independent tribes often at war with their neighbors. Their economies were basically agricultural, and although crafts flourished, many were geared to the demands of the tribal aristocracies rather than any larger market. Most of the population lived in the countryside and such concentrations as occurred in the hill forts and towns were small by comparison with the great cities of the Mediterranean world, and the markets which they created were correspondingly small.



    All of the more advanced areas, including the south of Britain, had some form of monetary economy (an economy in which coins or paper money is used as payment for goods and services), but in many areas this did not involve the widespread use of low-value copper coins, and without them the system was incapable of coping with the small transactions of everyday life. Thus the introduction of the Roman monetary system, which had a graduated coinage suitable for almost every transaction, had a revolutionary effect on the economy, the more so as it appeared together with a developed, if by our standards primitive, banking system with facilities for loans. Finally, the acceptance of all this was no doubt encouraged by the imposition of the elaborate system of Roman taxation.



    The rapid development of an extensive network of roads, particularly necessary for the short distance movement of raw materials and manufactured goods, also was of great importance, and it is probable that facilities for river traffic were also improved. It should also not be forgotten that the Roman government deliberately encouraged the romanization of the tribal aristocracies. The acceptance of such a concept would have involved not only wearing the toga—the distinctive garment of the Roman citizen—and taking baths, but also an appreciation of the advantages of urban life and of the idea that it was the duty of the wealthy citizens of a city or state to contribute to the public good by spending part of their fortune on public works. Taken together, these factors totally changed the economic face of Western Europe in a remarkably short time. In particular, they led to the appearance of true cities, which provided the markets necessary for the development and growth of industry.


  • 罗马帝国在几个世纪中不断从地中海扩张至整个欧洲,将不列颠、高卢(今法国)、西班牙及其他地区纳入其版图,在公元一至二世纪达到鼎盛。自然地,罗马的统治对新省份的经济产生了诸多影响。在技术层面上,罗马相比许多地方原住文化并无大幅领先,尽管越远离地中海地区,技术水平往往越低。尤其是不列颠,在某些方面技术发展令人意外地滞后;例如,制陶轮直到公元前一世纪末才被引入,而高卢早在四个世纪前就已使用该工具,陶窑到来得更晚。类似地,罗马本土用于金属冶炼的竖炉,直到征服不列颠之际才出现在当地。但在其他工艺如精密金属加工等方面——这些手艺通常服务于贵族阶层——本地工匠的技艺并不逊色于罗马人。

    尽管如此,随着新地区被纳入帝国统治,也随之带来了诸多根本性的重要变化。技术上的改变可能是最不显著的,许多更重要的变化则是间接地影响了工业。首先是“罗马和平”(Pax Romana),虽然这并非普遍且持续不变,但足以将原本持续战乱的状态转变为和平,这一变化本身就对贸易格局、人口增长以及市场扩展带来了深远影响。同样地,原本分散的部落被统一成一个个省份,长期而言势必打破了许多阻碍商品与工匠流通的文化障碍。尽管欧洲大部分地区原本就有相似的文化,但在政治上却被划分为许多相互交战的独立部落。他们的经济基本是农业为主,虽然手工业也存在,但主要是服务于部落贵族,而非更大的市场。大多数人口居住在乡村,即使在山地堡垒或城镇中有所集中,也远远不及地中海世界的大城市,因此市场规模也相应较小。

    所有较为发达的地区,包括不列颠南部,原本都存在某种形式的货币经济(即使用货币支付商品与服务的系统),但在许多地区,低面额的铜币并未广泛流通,缺乏这种货币使得日常生活中的小额交易难以完成。因此,罗马引入的货币系统——拥有不同面值的硬币,几乎适用于所有交易——对当地经济产生了革命性的影响,尤其是它还伴随着一个尽管从现代角度看很原始,但确实存在的贷款银行系统。最终,这一整套制度的接受程度无疑还受到罗马复杂税收制度的推动。

    罗马迅速发展了一套广泛的道路网络,尤其对短距离运输原材料与制成品极为重要;河运设施也可能有所改善。此外,不应忽视的是,罗马政府有意推动部落贵族的“罗马化”。接受这一观念不仅意味着穿托加袍——罗马公民的标志性服饰——和洗澡,更意味着认同城市生活的好处,并接受这样一种理念:富裕公民有责任通过投资公共工程来回馈社会。综合而言,这些因素在极短时间内彻底改变了西欧的经济面貌。尤其是,它们促成了真正意义上的城市出现,而城市提供了工业发展所必需的市场。
  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 标签
    0 感谢 不懂
    解析
    【答案】C D E
    【题型】总结题
    【解析】
    A. The Romans supported the agricultural economies of European tribes with more effective tools and more efficient production of crafts to meet the increasing demands of the aristocracies. 错误,与主旨脱节:全文几乎没有说“支持农业经济”或“帮助贵族扩大手工业产量”。 与第1段内容冲突:第1段强调“技术改进并不显著”,罗马也未提供“更有效的工具”。 错误归因:将经济增长归因于“手工业支持贵族”,而非文章强调的货币系统、和平、交通、城市等。 属于无中生有以及逻辑错误:误解“经济推动力” 。
    B. The impact of the Romans in Europe was mostly technological and was marked by the introduction of such manufacturing tools as the potter’s wheel, the potter’s kiln, and the blast furnace. 错误,与第2段主旨矛盾:原文明确指出“Technological changes were probably the least significant”(技术变化最不重要)。 
    误导性总结:虽提到工具,但其目的是说明不列颠落后,不是强调罗马技术输入。 
    制造伪主旨:将技术作为“主要影响”,与作者论点直接相反。 所以这道题反转了主旨, 使用细节错误归纳整篇文章 。
    C. The introduction of coins of different values into the economy facilitated the carrying out of almost every transaction required by a monetary economy. 正确,精准对应第3段:“...which had a graduated coinage suitable for almost every transaction… had a revolutionary effect on the economy…”
    体现“制度革新” → 支撑文章主旨“罗马带来重大经济变革” 
    与导语句逻辑一致:“罗马征服→深远经济影响”,货币系统是关键改革之一。 
    关键词对应:coins of different values → graduated coinage;facilitated → had a revolutionary effect
    D. The introduction of the Roman peace helped unify politically divided tribes and transformed the economy in important ways. 正确,对应了第2段核心论述:“…the Pax Romana… converted a normal condition of war to one of peace… consequences… on trade, population, and markets were profound.”  准确描述罗马和平如何实现政治统一+经济转型,是社会结构变革的代表性总结语句,支撑全文主旨 
    关键词对应:Roman peace → Pax Romana;unify + transform → trade/population/market impact
    E. Improvements in transportation and social changes based on Roman political and cultural values led to the emergence of cities and the development and growth of industry. 正确,对应第4段核心论点:“…extensive network of roads… romanization of tribal aristocracies… appearance of true cities… development and growth of industry.”
    概括了两个关键机制:1. 基础设施建设(交通);2. 社会价值观转变(城市化 + 公共责任) 
    支撑主旨句“significant impact”中的长期制度与文化重塑
    关键词对应:transportation → roads, river traffic;social changes → romanization;industry → public markets and cities
    F. The Romans introduced an elaborate system of taxation in order to encourage the citizenry to appreciate the importance of contributing to the public good from their earnings. 错误,原文提到税收制度的存在,但目的不是“鼓励人们理解公共事业的重要性”。 
    原句是:“The acceptance of all this was no doubt encouraged by the imposition of the elaborate system of Roman taxation.” 也就是说表明了“税收促使人们接受新制度”,并非“教育公民履行义务”。所以这里有一个因果关系:倒置了“原因”和“影响”。 

题目讨论

如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。

最新提问