机经真题 22 Passage 2

纠错
置顶

The First Land-Dwelling Organisms

纠错

What can be inferred from paragraph 2 about the crossopterygians?

Click on an oval to select your answer. To choose a different answer,

click one different oval.

  • A
    They reproduced as productively on land as in the water.
  • B
    They retained the physical features essential to life in the water while living on land.
  • C
    They were not affected by extreme environmental dryness.
  • D
    They may have been ancestors of animals that made the transition from water to land.
显示答案
正确答案: D

我的笔记 编辑笔记

  • 原文
  • 译文
  • Although amphibians were the first vertebrates to live on land, they were not the first land-living organisms. Land plants, which probably evolved from green algae, first evolved during the Ordovician (490 million-443 million years ago). Furthermore, insects, millipedes, spiders, and even snails invaded the land before amphibians did. Fossil evidence indicates that such land-dwelling arthropods as scorpions and flightless insects had evolved by at least the Devonian (416 million-359 million years ago).



    The transition from water to land required the amphibians to surmount several barriers. The most critical were extreme dryness, reproduction, the effects of gravity, and the extraction of oxygen from the atmosphere by lungs rather than from water by gills. These problems were partly solved by the crossopterygians (fleshy-finned fish known only in fossil form): they already had a backbone and limbs that could be used for walking and lungs that could extract oxygen



    Nevertheless, the question remains as to when animals made the transition from water to land, and how and why it came about. The discovery in 1992 of fossilized footprints of tetrapods (four-limbed vertebrates) more than 365 million years old forced paleontologists to rethink how and when animals emerged onto land. The footprint path that Swiss geologist Iwan Stossel discovered that year on Valentia Island, off Ireland's coast, has shed light on the early evolution of tetrapods. From these footprints, geologists estimate that the creature was longer than 1 meter and had fairly large back legs. Furthermore, instead of walking on dry land, this animal was probably walking or wading around in a shallow tropical stream filled with aquatic vegetation and predatory fish. This hypothesis is based on the fact that the trackway showed no evidence of a tail being dragged behind it. Unfortunately, no hones are associated with the tracks to help reconstruct what this primitive tetrapod looked like.



    One of the intriguing questions paleontologists ask is, why did limbs evolve in the first place? Probably not for walking on land.In fact, many scientists think aquatic limbs made it easier for animals to move around in streams, lakes, or swamps that were choked with water plants or other debris.The scant fossil evidence also seems to support this hypothesis.Fossils of Acanthostega, a tetrapod found in 360-million-year-old rocks from Greenland, reveal an animal with limbs but one clearly unable to walk on land.Paleontologist Jenny Clack, who recovered hundreds of specimens of Acanthostega, points out that Acanthostega's limbs were not strong enough to support its weight on land, and its rib cage was too small for the necessary muscles needed to hold its body off the ground. In addition, Acanthostega had gills and lungs, meaning it could survive on land but it was more suited for the water. Clack thinks Acanthostega used its limbs to maneuver around in swampy, plant-filled waters, where swimming would be difficult and limbs were an advantage. These shallow, aquatic environments became increasingly common during the Late Devonian, and they may have helped to drive the evolution of tetrapod limbs.



    Fragmentary fossils from other tetrapods living at about the same time as Acanthostega suggest, however, that some of these early tetrapods may have spent more time on dry land than in the water. These amphibians, many of which are also found in the Upper Devonian Old Red Sandstone of eastern Greenland, had streamlined bodies, long tails, and fins along their backs. In addition to four legs, they had a strong backbone, rib cage, and pelvic and pectoral girdles, all of which were structural adaptations for walking on land. Many of these earliest amphibians seem to have inherited numerous characteristics from the crossopterygians with little modification.



    The Late Paleozoic amphibians did not at all resemble the familiar frogs, toads, newts, and salamanders that make up modern amphibians. Rather, they displayed a broad spectrum of sizes, shapes, and modes of life. One group of amphibians was the labyrinthodonts, most of which were large animals, as long as 2 meters. These typically sluggish creatures lived in swamps and streams, eating fish, vegetation, insects, and other small amphibians. Labyrinthodonts were abundant during the Carboniferous (359 million-299 million years ago), when swampy conditions were widespread, but they soon declined in abundance during the Permian (299 million-251 million years ago, following the Carboniferous), perhaps in response to changing climatic conditions.


  • 虽然两栖动物是最早在陆地上生活的脊椎动物,但它们并不是最早的陆生生物。陆地植物很可能起源于绿藻类,最早出现在奥陶纪(约4.9亿至4.43亿年前)。此外,昆虫、千足虫、蜘蛛,甚至蜗牛都早于两栖动物登陆。化石证据表明,一些陆地节肢动物,如蝎子和不会飞的昆虫,最迟在泥盆纪(约4.16亿至3.59亿年前)就已进化出来。

    从水生到陆生的转变要求两栖动物克服多个障碍。最关键的挑战包括极度干燥、繁殖、重力影响以及通过肺从空气中提取氧气(而非通过鳃从水中获取)。这些问题部分地被一种名为“总鳍鱼类”(仅存于化石中的肉鳍鱼)所解决:它们已有脊柱和可以用于行走的四肢,以及可以呼吸空气的肺。

    ]然而,动物究竟是在什么时候、如何以及为何从水中走向陆地,这些问题仍未有定论。1992年发现的四足动物(四肢脊椎动物)化石足迹距今超过3.65亿年,这一发现迫使古生物学家重新思考动物何时、如何登陆的问题。那一年,瑞士地质学家伊万·斯托塞尔在爱尔兰海岸附近的瓦伦西亚岛发现的足迹路径,揭示了四足动物早期演化的一些线索。地质学家据此推测,这种生物体长超过1米,后腿相当粗壮。此外,这种动物很可能并非在干燥的陆地上行走,而是在布满水生植物和掠食性鱼类的热带浅水中漫步或涉水前行。这个推测基于足迹中未出现拖尾痕迹。遗憾的是,目前尚未在这些足迹附近发现骨骼,因而无法重建这种原始四足动物的外形。

    古生物学家提出的一个引人入胜的问题是:四肢最初是为何进化出来的?它们可能并不是为了在陆地上行走。实际上,许多科学家认为,水中环境中的四肢有助于动物在布满水生植物或其他杂物的溪流、湖泊或沼泽中活动。有限的化石证据似乎也支持这一假设。阿康托棘鱼的化石——一种发现于格陵兰3.6亿年前岩层中的四足动物——显示这种动物虽然拥有四肢,但显然无法在陆地上行走。古生物学家珍妮·克拉克收集了数百具阿康托棘鱼标本,并指出:它的四肢不足以支撑其体重,其肋骨也过小,无法容纳足以支撑身体的肌肉。此外,阿康托棘鱼同时拥有鳃和肺,说明它可以在陆地上存活,但更适应水中生活。克拉克认为,它是用四肢在布满植物的沼泽中活动,因为在那种环境下游泳不便,四肢是一种优势。

    然而,与阿康托棘鱼生活在相同时期的其他一些四足动物的零散化石表明,它们可能比阿康托棘鱼花更多时间在陆地上。这些两栖动物中有许多也发现于格陵兰东部泥盆纪晚期的“旧红砂岩”中,它们具有流线型身体、长尾巴和背鳍。除了四肢外,它们还有强壮的脊柱、肋骨和骨盆及肩带,这些都是适应陆地行走的结构特征。这些最早期的两栖动物中,很多似乎在继承总鳍鱼特征的基础上几乎没有太多变化。

    晚古生代的两栖动物与现代的青蛙、蟾蜍、蝾螈和蝌蚪等熟悉物种完全不同。它们在体型、形态和生活方式方面展现出多样性。其中一类被称为“迷齿类”的两栖动物大多数体型庞大,可达两米长。这些行动迟缓的动物生活在沼泽和溪流中,以鱼类、植物、昆虫和其他小型两栖动物为食。在石炭纪(约3.59亿至2.99亿年前)这种潮湿环境广泛存在时期,迷齿类动物数量众多;但在随后的二叠纪(约2.99亿至2.51亿年前),它们数量迅速减少,可能是对气候变化作出的响应。
  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 标签
    2 感谢 不懂
    解析
    【答案】D
    【题型】推断题
    【解析】题干要求从第2段推断关于 crossopterygians(总鳍鱼类) 的内容。
    第2段相关句:“These problems were partly solved by the crossopterygians (fleshy-finned fish known only in fossil form): they already had a backbone and limbs that could be used for walking and lungs that could extract oxygen.”
    本段围绕“两栖动物登陆前需克服的困难”展开:
    困难包括: 干燥环境,繁殖,重力影响,呼吸方式改变(从鳃变为肺) 
    然后接着说:crossopterygians 已有部分适应特征:脊柱,可行走的四肢,肺(可呼吸空气))所以这些特征意味着它们具备了“从水到陆”转变的关键能力。
    虽然原文没有直接说它们是“祖先”,但从逻辑推断来看,它们具备的特征正是后来陆生脊椎动物所继承的 → 有合理推断空间。
    选项逐一分析:
    A. They reproduced as productively on land as in the water. 错误,原文完全没有提及繁殖能力的比较,更没有说在陆地上是否“高效繁殖”,无中生有型干扰项
    B. They retained the physical features essential to life in the water while living on land. 错误,原文中并没有提到它们生活在陆地上,只是说它们具有可在陆地上使用的特征(如肺和肢)推理错误:将“具有某种特征”误读为“已在陆地生活” 
    C. They were not affected by extreme environmental dryness. 错误,原文并没有说它们可以应对干燥环境,只是说它们解决了“部分问题”,这是一个干扰项:以为“部分适应” = “完全不受影响” 
    D. They may have been ancestors of animals that made the transition from water to land. 正确,原文说它们拥有“脊柱、肢体、肺”等与陆地生活相关的关键特征,这些特征正是后来两栖动物的核心演化基础,虽未直说是“祖先”,但根据“功能承接 + 时间早 + 特征吻合”可合理推断 
    在这道题中,答案不是显性陈述,而是从“具备关键特征”这一事实中合理推演其演化关系角色,而其他选项均存在偷换概念或虚构信息的问题 

题目讨论

如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。

最新提问