机经真题 25 Passage 1

纠错
置顶

The Collision Model of the Moon's Formation

纠错

Directions: An introductory sentence for a brief summary of the passage is provided below. Complete the summary by selecting the 3 answer choices that express the most important ideas in the passage, some sentences do not belong in the summary because they express ideas that are not presented in the passage or are minor ideas in the passage. This question is worth 2 points.

Drag your answer choices to the spaces where they belong. To remove an answer choice, click on it.To review the passage, click VIEW TEXT.

Lunar samples brought back by the Apollo spacecraft helped scientists understand how the Moon formed.

显示答案
正确答案: B C D
  • A.
    Unlike most bodies in the solar system, the Moon did not form through an accretion process, and lunar samples show that it is mostly added up from elements that vaporize readily.
  • B.
    Similarities between rocks from the Moon and rocks from Earth's mantle support the idea that the Moon formed from debris ejected into space from the mantles of Earth and a colliding body.
  • C.
    Modeling indicates that bodies large enough to create a lot of debris when they collided were in Earth's accretion zone, and their impact could have created enough heat to form a metal core.
  • D.
    The lack of siderophiles in the lunar samples is best explained by the theory that Earth and the large projectile that struck it had already formed iron cores by the time that they collided.
  • E.
    Earth's accretion process produced small bodies that collided with each other, producing radioactive materials that became Earth's main source of heat.
  • F.
    The bodies in Earth's accretion zone were the size of Mars rather than the 10 percent of the mass of the final planet predicted by George Wetherill, so a collisional origin probably did not actually happen.

我的笔记 编辑笔记

  • 原文
  • 译文
  • The collection and analysis of rocks brought back from the Moon during the Apollo spaceflight program in 1969 renewed interest in the process by which the Moon formed. One theory, the collision model, was that Earth, while it was still in the process of forming, was hit by a projectile that was Mars-sized (half the diameter of Earth). While some debris from this collision was ejected into space, other debris remained in Earth's orbit, where it formed a thin ring of rocks. The Moon then formed from this ring by accretion, the processes of collision and sticking responsible for building most bodies in the solar system. Consistent with this model was the finding that lunar samples were depleted of elements that vaporize readily, such as zinc, as would have occurred as a result of a violent impact. Stuck in the gas phase, these elements would have been swept into space. Apollo's samples were also exceedingly dry, water being among the lost substances.



    Another remarkable property of lunar samples is that they are highly depleted in the siderophile, or iron-loving elements that tend to concentrate in the metallic iron cores of planets. When planetary cores form by the molten iron sinking to the planet's center, the siderophile elements (such as platinum, gold, and iridium) are incorporated into the falling iron and are highly depleted from the crustal and mantle materials left above (the mantle is the layer above the core, while the crust is the thin outermost layer). That the lunar rocks were depleted in siderophile elements was peculiar, however, because the Moon cannot have a substantial iron core. The mean density of the Moon is 3.4 times the density of water, very similar to that of rocks on the lunar surface and much lower than that of Earth, which is 5.5 times the mean density of water. If it had a substantial core of dense metallic iron, the mean density of the Moon would be higher than is observed.



    The collision model solves the siderophile mystery by suggesting that metallic cores had formed in both Earth and the impact projectile before the collision. In the collision, the iron cores of both bodies ended up in the center of Earth, and the debris ejected into orbit was mainly from the mantles of both bodies. The preceding burying of siderophiles in planetary cores explains why gold and platinum are so rare on the Moon and in the crustal rocks of Earth. The impact ejection of mantle materials from both the giant impactor and the target Earth is consistent with some of the remarkable similarities between the Moon's trace elements (elements that exist in only low concentrations) and those of rocks from Earth's mantle. It is also consistent with Earth and the Moon having identical ratios of the isotopes (variations of a single element) of the elements that are present on both of them.



    A collisional origin is very appealing, but did it actually happen? For an impact to eject enough material to form the Moon, the colliding body has to be huge, a Mars-sized body. Theoretical modeling of planet formation by planetary scientist George Wetherill showed that a natural consequence of the accretion process is that several large bodies do form in each planet's accretion zone (the area in which the planet-forming material accumulates). The growth process includes the impact of several bodies, each of which carries more than 10 percent of the mass of the final planet.



    In the case of Earth, these big bodies were the size of Mars and larger. Their impact not only ejected material into space but also injected considerable amounts of heat into Earth's mantle. This heat input and great violence led to the forging of Earth's core during the accretion phase, before the planet was fully formed. Core formation requires high internal temperatures so that blobs of molten iron descend through the mantle to reach the core. Celestial objects that form through the accretion of small bodies form a core only after long-term buildup of radioactive heat from the decay of uranium, potassium, and thorium. In Earth's case, the early heat from the accretion of large bodies led to core formation as accretion occurred. Both Earth and the large projectile that struck it had differentiated (separated into layers) and already had metal cores at the time of collision.


  • 1969年阿波罗太空飞行计划期间从月球带回的岩石的收集和分析重新激发了人们对月球形成过程的兴趣。一种理论,称为碰撞模型,提出当地球仍在形成过程中时,被一个相当于火星大小(直径是地球的一半)的物体撞击。虽然这次碰撞的部分碎片被抛入太空,但其他碎片仍留在地球轨道上,形成了一圈薄薄的岩石环。月球随后通过吸积——一种负责构建太阳系中大多数天体的碰撞和粘合过程——从这一岩石环中形成。与该模型一致的是,月球样本缺乏易挥发的元素,例如锌,这可能是由于一次剧烈碰撞所导致的。被困在气相中的这些元素会被扫入太空。阿波罗带回的样本也极其干燥,水是丢失的物质之一。

    月球样品的另一个显著特性是其中的亲铁元素(例如铂金、黄金和铱)极度匮乏,而这些元素倾向于集中在行星的金属铁核心中。当行星的核心通过熔融铁下沉到行星中心而形成时,亲铁元素会被纳入下沉的铁中,从而在上面的地壳和地幔材料中大量减少(地幔是位于核心之上的层,而地壳是最外面的薄层)。然而,月球岩石中亲铁元素的匮乏是特别的,因为月球不可能有一个大的铁核心。月球的平均密度是水的3.4倍,非常接近月球表面岩石的密度,远低于地球的平均密度5.5倍。如果月球有一个大的金属铁核心,那么其平均密度会高于观察到的值。

    碰撞模型通过假设在碰撞发生之前,地球和撞击投掷体(金星体)中都已经形成了金属核心,从而解决了含铁亲和元素的谜团。在碰撞过程中,这两个天体的铁核心都最终位于地球的中心,而喷射到轨道上的碎片主要来自两个天体的地幔。之前把含铁亲和元素埋藏在行星核心中的过程解释了为什么月球和地球地壳中黄金和铂金是如此稀少。来自巨型撞击器和目标地球的地幔材料的撞击喷射,与月球的微量元素(在低浓度下存在的元素)和地球地幔岩石的微量元素之间的一些显著相似性一致。这也与地球和月球上的同位素(某个元素的变种)比率相同一致。

    碰撞起源的理论非常有吸引力,但它真的发生过吗?为了让碰撞产生足够的物质来形成月球,撞击体必须非常巨大,至少要有火星大小。行星科学家乔治·韦瑟里尔(George Wetherill)通过理论建模行星形成过程显示,聚集过程的自然结果是,每个行星的聚集区(行星形成材料积累的区域)都会形成多个大体积的天体。行星的生长过程包括几次大体积天体的撞击,每个撞击体的质量都超过最终行星质量的10%以上。

    在地球的情况下,这些大大小小的天体都有火星及更大的体积。它们的撞击不仅将物质抛射到太空中,还向地幔注入了大量的热量。这些热量输入及巨大的撞击力导致了地球核心在积聚阶段的锻造,而这时行星尚未完全形成。核心的形成需要高温,才能让熔融铁滴通过地幔下降到达核心。通过小天体的积聚而形成的天体,其核心的形成是经过长期的放射性元素(铀、钾和钍)衰变所产生的热量累积的结果。对于地球来说,大型天体的早期热量使核心在积聚过程中就已经形成。地球和与之相撞的巨大天体在碰撞时都已经分化(分成了不同层次)并且已经有了金属核心。
  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 标签
    3 感谢 不懂
    解析
    【答案】BCD
    【题型】总结题
    【解析】选项 B:月球岩石和地球地幔岩石之间的相似性支持这样一种观点:月球是由地球和一个碰撞天体的地幔物质抛入太空后形成的。对应到第三段后半部分,该部分内容强调了月球岩石与地球地幔岩石之间的相似性, 这一证据对碰撞模型非常重要,该模型认为月球是由一次巨大的碰撞(地球和一个火星大小的天体之间的碰撞)所产生的物质形成的。 C选项对应到第五段,这些大天体的碰撞不仅将物质喷射到太空中,还将大量热量注入地球的地幔,这种热量输入和剧烈冲击导致了地球核心的形成,地球的吸积区内存在足够大的天体,其碰撞会产生大量碎片,并可能提供足够的热量使得金属物质下沉形成核心。这些信息支持了碰撞模型,即地球和另一个大型天体的碰撞不仅产生了足以形成月球的碎片,而且在此过程中也产生了足够的热量来帮助地球形成金属核心。 选项 C符合原文。选项 D说月球样本中亲铁元素的匮乏最好用这样一个理论来解释,即在碰撞发生时,地球和撞击的巨大天体已经形成了铁核心,对应到第三段首句。

题目讨论

如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。

最新提问