机经真题 15 Passage 2

纠错
置顶

The Emergence of the State

纠错

Directions: An introductory sentence for a brief summary of the passage is provided below. Complete the summary by selecting the THREE answer choices that express the most important ideas in the passage. Some sentences do not belong in the summary because they express ideas that are not presented in the passage or are minor ideas in the passage. This question is worth 2 points.

Drag your answer choices to the spaces where they belong. To remove an answer choice, click on it.To review the passage, click VIEW TEXT.

As human societies became larger, some developed into prestates or early states.

显示答案
正确答案: A B F
  • A.
    The replacement of hunting and gathering with herding and agriculture led to more complex societies known as prestates, organized in a hierarchy with one powerful leader at the top.
  • B.
    Resources in prestates were controlled by the ruler, who redistributed some of them for specific uses, such as to support soldiers or religious leaders.
  • C.
    The first states developed 6,000 years ago when the prestates that preceded them collapsed because of warfare, political instability, and the challenges of feeding their growing populations.
  • D.
    The earliest prestates were small, loosely organized chiefdoms or kingdoms in which some people hunted in bands or collected food in the wild, while others cultivated plants or herded animals.
  • E.
    One feature of prestates was the use of large storage places, such as mounds, which were later central to the development of new systems of economic exchange.
  • F.
    Agriculture and the increase in populations led to the organization of societies into early states, which were still hierarchical but distributed power among bureaucrats spread throughout the state.

我的笔记 编辑笔记

  • 原文
  • 译文
  • Before there was agriculture, people lived in small, loosely organized bands or tribes that hunted for and collected food in the wild. The emergence of horticulture (cultivating plants) and pastoralism (herding animals) led to predecessors of the state, or "prestates," such as chiefdoms or kingdoms. In prestates, food producers, including horticulturalists and pastoralists, were integrated into a hierarchical political and economic structure with a "chief," "lord," or "king," who occupied the highest position. People were ranked under this centralized leader, who could have considerable power and influence, much more than band or tribal leaders.



    An interesting example in the archaeological record is Cahokia, a city of mounds (human-made hills that supported various structures) that existed in what is today the central United States. Emerging around C.E. 1050, Cahokia consisted of thousands of people. It had collapsed by 1500, but at its peak around 1150, more people lived at Cahokia (about 20,000 people) than in London. Like chiefdoms, Cahokia was characterized by hierarchy: below the chief, an elite class of subchiefs (who were most likely related to the chief) ruled the leaders of family clans who, in turn, ruled the commoners. Not only were the people ranked by title, but it was also inscribed into the landscape: atop the largest mound-which, at about 100 feet (30 meters) tall, rose above everything and everyone else in the city-the chief administered Cahokia.



    Economically, the people who lived in prestates like Cahokia practiced mutual dependence and exchange. But unlike foraging bands or tribal pastoralists or horticulturalists, some people had access to power, prestige, and even resources, such as food, that others did not, primarily because of their rank in the social order. This is where an economic system called redistribution comes into play. In this type of economic exchange, resources (e.g. crops at Cahokia) flowed into one central locale (e.g. the chief at Cahokia), and then they were redistributed again to support, for example, full-time warriors or religious specialists. In some way, the process works like taxes do today, although this modern practice is much more depersonalized. Notably, while resources flowed back out to the masses from the chief, though certainly not in the same form, the act of redistribution often increased the wealth, power, and prestige of the chief and his subordinates. Consequently, chiefs, lords, or kings often had the power to control land and resources in ways that tribal or band leaders did not.



    Chiefs, lords, and kings often maintained their political and economic domination through coercion and warfare. In this regard, some chiefdoms or kingdoms were very much like ancient states, which expanded through large-scale conquest. But, unlike chiefdoms or kingdoms, these early states consisted of much larger populations.



    Early states-hierarchical political systems characterized by centralized governments more sophisticated than those of prestates-arose primarily around large-scale agriculture and first emerged about 5,000 to 6,000 years ago. Many of these developed independently of one another in places all over the world: Central America, South America, Africa, and Southeast Asia. These states had centralized power, that is, a consolidated authority was organized around a ruling bureaucracy rather than just one chief, king, or lord. For example, while Cahokia had a centralized authority-a chief -the Maya civilization of Central America (which collapsed around C.E. 900) had a ruling body of individuals spread throughout the state. Like Rome (also a state), the Maya had bureaucrats who governed outlying towns and cities.



    Political centralization was only the beginning, however. Integrating people within a centralized, ruling bureaucracy often included state-sponsored religion, the presence of a highly organized military (for both expansion and defense), mutual dependence (as in bands and tribes), redistribution (as in chiefdoms or kingdoms), and market exchange (the exchange of goods and services through the use of money). In times past, "money" included items such as shells, beads, animal skins, precious metals, and rice. Markets were especially important to the development of states. Indeed, the state depended on market exchange to survive. For example, as people settled, their diets became increasingly limited to a few crops. They were able to produce more food for more people, but the number of available foods remained small if people could not trade for them.


  • 在农业出现之前,人们生活在小型、松散组织的群体或部落中,通过狩猎和采集野生食物为生。园艺(种植植物)和牧业(放牧牲畜)的出现导致了早期国家的前身,或称为“国家前阶段”社会,如酋长国或王国。在国家前阶段社会中,食物生产者,包括园艺工作者和牧民,被整合进一个等级化的政治和经济结构中,结构的最高位置由“酋长”、“领主”或“国王”占据。人们在这个集中的领导人之下被排名分配,这个领导人的权力和影响比群体或部落的领导人要大得多。

    在考古记录中,一个有趣的例子是卡霍基亚,这是一座土丘之城(由人类建造的支持各类建筑的土丘),它位于今天的美国中部地区。卡霍基亚大约在公元1050年左右兴起,居住着成千上万的人口。虽然它在1500年左右崩溃了,但在其顶峰时期(大约在1150年)卡霍基亚的人口(约20,000人)比当时的伦敦还要多。与酋长国类似,卡霍基亚的特点是等级制度:在酋长之下,一群精英阶层的副酋长(他们很可能与酋长有亲属关系)统治着家族氏族的领导者,而家族氏族的领导者则统治着平民。人们不仅按头衔分层,而且这种等级制度也体现在地形上:在最高的土丘顶上——这个土丘约有100英尺(30米)高,凌驾于城市的一切人和物之上——酋长管理着卡霍基亚。

    在经济方面,居住在像卡霍基亚这样的国家前阶段社会中的人们实行互相依赖和交换。但与觅食群体或部落的牧民或园艺工作者不同,有些人因为在社会等级中的地位而能获得权力、声望,甚至是资源(如食物),而其他人则不能。这时,一种称为再分配的经济系统发挥作用。在这种类型的经济交换中,资源(例如卡霍基亚的作物)流入一个集中地点(例如卡霍基亚的酋长),然后再被重新分配,用于支持全职战士或宗教专家等人。在某种程度上,这个过程类似于今天的税收制度,尽管现代的税收实践更为去个人化。值得注意的是,尽管资源从酋长那里回流到大众手中,虽然绝不是以原来的形式再现,但再分配的行为通常增加了酋长及其下属的财富、权力和声望。因此,酋长、领主或国王通常有能力以部落或群体领导者所没有的方式控土地和资源。

    酋长、领主和国王通常通过强制和战争来维持他们的政治和经济统治。在这方面,一些酋长国或王国非常像古代的国家,这些国家通过大规模的征服来扩展。但是,与酋长国或王国不同,这些早期的国家拥有更大的人口规模。

    早期国家——具有集中政府的分层政治系统,比前国家时期的系统更为复杂——主要起源于大规模农业,并于大约 5000 到 6000 年前首次出现。这些国家中的许多是相互独立地发展起来的,遍布世界各地:中美洲、南美洲、非洲和东南亚。这些国家具有集中的权力,即一个集中的权威围绕一个统治官僚系统而组织起来,而不仅仅是一个酋长、国王或领主。例如,虽然 Cahokia 拥有一个集中的权威——一个酋长——但中美洲的玛雅文明(约公元 900 年崩溃)拥有一个分散在全州各地的统治机构。像罗马(也是一个国家)一样,玛雅人有官僚管理偏远的城镇和城市。

    政治中央集权只是一个开始。然而,将人们整合到一个集中的统治官僚体制内,通常包括国家支持的宗教、高度组织化的军事力量(用于扩张和防御)、相互依赖(如在帮派和部落中)、再分配(如在酋邦或王国中)以及市场交换(通过使用货币进行商品和服务的交换)。在过去,"货币"包括贝壳、珠子、兽皮、贵金属和大米等物品。市场对国家的发展尤为重要。实际上,国家依靠市场交换来生存。例如,随着人们定居,他们的饮食越来越局限于几种作物。他们能够为更多的人生产更多的食物,但如果人们无法进行交易,那么可用的食物种类仍然很少。
  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 标签
    0 感谢 不懂
    解析

    【答案】ABF

    【题型】总结题

    【解析】 A. The replacement of hunting and gathering with herding and agriculture led to more complex societies known as prestates, organized in a hierarchy with one powerful leader at the top.(狩猎和采集被畜牧业和农业所取代,导致了更复杂的社会,即所谓的前国家,这些社会以一个强大的领导者为顶点,层级结构严密。)这个选项概述了文章开头部分的核心内容:随着农业和畜牧业的发展,社会从简单的狩猎和采集团体发展为更复杂的前国家社会,这些社会具有层级结构,并在顶层有一个强有力的领导者。这是文章的一个核心观点。

    B. Resources in prestates were controlled by the ruler, who redistributed some of them for specific uses, such as to support soldiers or religious leaders.(前国家的资源由统治者控制,统治者将部分资源重新分配用于特定用途,例如支持士兵或宗教领袖。)这个选项总结了文章中关于前国家经济体系的内容,特别是关于资源的控制和重新分配。这一点在文章中被详细讨论,强调了前国家如何通过资源的再分配支持不同的社会角色(如士兵和宗教领袖)。这是对前国家经济和政治结构的一个重要描述。

    F. Agriculture and the increase in populations led to the organization of societies into early states, which were still hierarchical but distributed power among bureaucrats spread throughout the state.(农业和人口增长导致了社会组织成早期国家,这些国家仍然是层级结构,但权力分散在整个国家的官僚体系中。)这个选项总结了后半部分的内容,指出农业和人口增长如何促成早期国家的出现。这些国家仍然是层级化的,但权力分散在整个国家的官僚体系内,这一点是对比前国家和早期国家组织结构的重要论述。

    排除其他选项的原因:

    C. The first states developed 6,000 years ago when the prestates that preceded them collapsed because of warfare, political instability, and the challenges of feeding their growing populations. (第一个国家在6000年前发展起来,当时之前的前国家因战争、政治不稳定和养活不断增长的人口的挑战而崩溃。)文章没有说明前国家崩溃是因为战争、政治不稳定和供养人口的挑战。

    D. The earliest prestates were small, loosely organized chiefdoms or kingdoms in which some people hunted in bands or collected food in the wild, while others cultivated plants or herded animals.(最早的前国家是小型的、松散组织的酋邦或王国,其中一些人以帮派形式狩猎或在野外采集食物,而其他人则种植植物或放牧动物。)这个选项只关注前国家的最初状态,未能反映出文章的核心讨论,即农业和社会复杂化的发展。

    E. One feature of prestates was the use of large storage places, such as mounds, which were later central to the development of new systems of economic exchange.(前国家的一个特点是使用大规模的储存场所,如土丘,这后来成为新经济交换体系发展的中心。)虽然文章提到Cahokia的土丘,但这并不是文章的主要议题。文章主要关注的是社会结构、经济体系以及政治中央化,而非具体的建筑特征。

    【难度】


题目讨论

如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。

最新提问