Official 01 Set 5

  • Q1
  • Q2
  • Q3
  • Q4
  • Q5
  • Q6


  • Q1
  • Q2
  • Q3
  • Q4
  • Q5
  • Q6
What is the lecture mainly about?
  • A. Art in the Neolithic period

  • B. The site of a Neolithic town

  • C. Methods of making stone tools

  • D. The domestication of plants and animals by early farmers

显示答案 正确答案: B

我的笔记 编辑笔记

  • 原文
  • 译文
  • 查看听力原文


    NARRATOR:Listen to part of a lecture in an archaeology class.

    FEMALE PROFESSOR:OK,we've been talking about early agriculture in the Near East, so let’s concentrate on one site and see what we can learn from it.Let’s look at Çatalhöyük … um, I better write that down.

    Çatalhöyük [slowly], that’s about as close as we get in English.It’s Turkish really--the site’s in modern-day Turkey, and who knows what the original inhabitants called it.

    Anyway, um, Çatalhöyük wasn’t the first agricultural settlement in the Near East, but it was pretty early--settled about 9,000 years ago, in the Neolithic period.And, uh, the settlement--a town, really--lasted about a thousand years, and grew to a size of about 8 or 10 thousand people.That certainly makes it one of the largest towns in the world at that time.One of the things that makes the settlement of this size impressive is the time period...It’s the Neolithic, remember--the late Stone Age--so the people that lived there had only stone tools--no metals--so everything they accomplished, like building this town, they did with just stone,... plus wood, bricks, that sort of thing.But you got to remember that it wasn't just any stone they had, they had obsidian.

    And um... obsidian is a black, volcanic, well, almost like glass. It flakes very nicely into really sharp points. The sharpest tools of the entire Stone Age were made of obsidian,and uh... the people of Catalhoyuk got theirs from further inland, from central Turkey, traded for it, probably.

    Anyway, what I wanna focus on is the way the town was built.The houses are all rectangular, one storey, made of sun-dried bricks,but what's really interesting is that there are no spaces between them.No streets in other words, and so generally no doors on the houses either.People walked around on the roofs and entered the house through a hatchway on the roof, down a wooden ladder.You can still see the diagonal marks of the ladders in the plaster on the inside walls.

    Once you were in the house, there would be one main room and a couple of small rooms for storage. The main room had the hearths, for cooking and for heat. It would've been pretty cold during the winters. And it also looks like they made their tools near the fire. There tends to be a lot of obsidian flakes and chips in the hearth ashes, but no chimney. The smoke just went out the same hatchway that people used for going in and out themselves.

    So there would have been an open fire inside the house with only one hole in the roof to let the smoke out.You and I would have found it a bit too smoky in there.You can see on the walls, which they plastered and decorated with paintings...they ended up with a layer of black soot on them, and so did people's lungs.The bones found in the graves show a layer of soot on the inside of the ribs.

    And that's another unusual feature of Catalhoyuk, the burial sites. The graves have all been found under the houses, right under the floors. And it may be this burial custom that explains why the houses were packed in so tightly without streets.I mean, you might think it was for protection or something,but there has been no evidence found yet of any violent attack that would indicate that kind of danger.It may be they wanted to live as near as possible to their ancestors' graves and be buried near them themselves.But it makes a good point. Based on excavations, we can know the layout of the houses and the location of the graves,but we're only guessing when we tried to say why they did it that way.That's the way it is with archeology. You are dealing with the physical remains that people left behind.We have no sure access to what they thought and how they felt about things. I mean it's interesting to speculate. And the physical artifacts can give us clues, but there is a lot we can't really know.

    So, for instance, their art.They painted on the plastered walls and usually they painted hunting scenes with wild animals in them.Now they did hunt and they also raised cereal crops and kept sheep, but we don't know why so many of the paintings are of hunting scenes.Was it supposed to have religious or magical significance?That's the kind of thing we can only guess at based on clues, and hopefully, further excavation of Catalhoyuk will yield more clues.But we'll probably never know for sure.

  • 旁白:听一段考古学课堂讲座。




    哦…黑曜石是一种黑色,火山岩质类似玻璃的石头。它能成片剥落而形成精致的尖角。整个石器时代最锋利的工具由黑曜石制成,同时,嗯…Catalhoyuk 人从更远的内陆——土耳其中部,采集,甚至交换得到他们的黑曜石。




    这是Catalhoyuk 墓葬遗址又一特征。在房子地板的正下方我们发现这些墓葬。或许这种丧葬风俗解释了为什么房子间间隔紧凑没有街道的原因。我猜你会认为间隔紧凑出于安全的考虑,但是没有发现能表明存在此种危险的证据。也可能他们想生前死后都与祖先“朝夕相处”。这样看来,倒是有几分道理。通过挖掘,我们了解房子的布局和墓葬的位置,但是我们前面说过的安全考虑只是瞎猜而已。考古就需要这样做。因为你面对的只是古人留下的实物残骸。没有可靠的途径来了解他们的思想和他们对事物的看法。我想推测也不失为一件乐事。当然这些古器实物能给我们提供线索,但是很多信息我们仍旧无从得知。

    比如说,他们的艺术。他们在灰泥墙上作画,也常画有野兽(和有人)的狩猎图。他们确实打猎,同时也在种植粮食作物、饲养绵羊,但我们不知道为什么有这么多画都只与狩猎相关。难道有宗教或魔法方面的意义?而这些我们只能基于现有线索做估测,所幸的是,对Catalhoyuk 进一步的挖掘工作将出土更多的实物和线索。但这一点谁也不能保证。

  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 本题对应音频:
    15 感谢 不懂



    OK, we’ve been talking about early agriculture in the Near East, so let’s concentrate on one site and see what we can learn from it.

    Let’s look at Çatalhöyük … um, I better write that down.


    文章开头说,今天要着重讲Catalhoyuk,全文确实也在讲这个site,讲了房屋、墓葬、艺术等等,所以答案选B。A选项,art是细节。C选项,stone tool是细节。D选项,未提到。