机经真题 1 Set 4

做题结果 3/6 | 用时 1min58s
分享小红书,免费领会员
Font Size: 默认
  • Font Size:默认
  • Font Size:14px
  • Font Size:20px
  • Font Size:16px
  • Font Size:18px
Speed: Normal
  • Slow:0.8倍
  • Normal:1.0倍
  • Fast:1.2倍
  • Rush:1.5倍
听力原文
精听文本

Question 4 of 6

In an experiment with two types of soft drink, what did researchers discover when participants did not know which brand they were drinking?

A. Participants reported that one drink tasted much better than the other.

B. Participants reported that there was no difference in the taste of the soft drinks.

C. The strength of neurological activity in the prefrontal cortex did not vary.

D. No neurological activity at all occurred in the prefrontal cortex.

我的答案 正确答案 C

本题用时0s

我的笔记 编辑笔记

  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 题目讨论
  • 本题对应音频:
    0 感谢 3 不懂
    音频1
    解析

    题干分析:在两种软饮料的实验中,如果受试者不知道品牌,发生的事情

     

    原文定位:

     

    Well, when participants did not know which soda they were tasting, the portion of the brain associated with strong emotions, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex was activated when they tasted a soda. The strength of the activation was the same no matter which brand of soda they were given

     

    选项分析:考察对比考点。在实验中,讲了如果受试者知道苏打水来自于哪个品牌,在喝更有名的品牌的苏打水时大脑中就会有更多的神经元被激活,而不知道苏打水来自于哪个品牌时大脑这部分的脑活动就不变,可知应选择C选项。A、D选项与C选项冲突,B选项未提及。

    标签
  • 题目讨论

    如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。

译文

Listen to part of a lecture in a psychology class.Okay, true story.A few years ago, I was staying at a hotel in Norway, in a fishing town, and I came down to breakfast the first morning to find a large buffet, the sort where you help yourself to just about anything.Well, I decided to go for some pancakes that looked really good.So I stacked several on my plate, found a table and dug in, took one big bite, and yuck.It was horrible.Turns out, it wasn\'t pancakes after all.It was fish cakes.Now don\'t get me wrong, normally, I quite like fish.But after that experience, I couldn\'t eat fish again for a month.So why did I react so badly to it?Probably because I had a specific expectation of what I was about to taste.And since what I put in my mouth didn\'t meet my expectations, I judged it as tasting bad.Now this idea that expectations can influence our experiences has been examined by psychologists in numerous experiments.In one, researchers gave away three cups of coffee to university students in a school cafeteria.After pouring the coffee, they directed the students to a table set with cream and sugar, the usual coffee additives, as well as some more unusual condiments, spices like cloves and cardamom, which aren\'t commonly added to coffee in this part of the world.What the researchers varied was how these unusual condiments, the cloves and cardamom, were displayed.Sometimes they were displayed in fine glass containers on a brushed metal tray with silver spoons.Other times they were placed in inexpensive Styrofoam cups.Finally, after the students tasted the coffee, the researchers asked them their opinion of it, and the results suggested that the way those unusual condiments were displayed seems to have affected opinions about the coffee, even though no one actually added them to their coffee.When the condiments were served in fancy containers, the students were much more likely to say they liked the coffee and would be willing to pay a high price for it.So one interpretation of what\'s going on here is that the condiment display affected the student\'s expectations about the quality of the coffee being offered.And their expectations, in turn, affected their actual opinion of the coffee, which is pretty interesting.But some psychologists raised an even more interesting possibility, that the reason our expectations influence our opinions is because our expectations change our physiological responses, the neurological activity that produces the experience for us.To investigate this, some neuroscientists conducted a taste test with two brands of soda.Let\'s just…… so I don\'t affect your expectations, let\'s just call them brand A and brand B.Okay, with brand A being the more popular.Now, the two sodas are very similar in taste, so the reason brand A sells better than brand B may have more to do with marketing than actual taste.Anyway, the experiment was designed to find out whether people\'s knowledge of which soda they were tasting actually changed the way it tasted to them.So as the participants tasted the soda, the neurological activity that went on in their brains was measured using a machine called an fMRI.That\'s a a functional magnetic resonance imaging machine.Now it\'s not so easy for people to drink something when they\'re lying down in an fMRI.So they had to drink the soda through a long tube.The researchers sometimes let them know which brand of soda they were getting, and sometimes they didn\'t.So what happened?Well, when participants did not know which soda they were tasting, the portion of the brain associated with strong emotions, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex was activated when they tasted a soda.The strength of the activation was the same no matter which brand of soda they were given.But when they were told which brand they were getting by being shown its logo, an additional part of the prefrontal cortex was also activated, the part involved in making associations and with higher order thinking.And the response there was stronger when they were given brand A.So when people knew they were tasting the more popular brand, more neurons in more parts of their brain were activated, suggesting that knowing which soda they were receiving may indeed have affected their perception of the way the soda tasted.