考满分23 写作检测 写作检测结果页

模考结果

综合写作

评分结果

?
Limited,17分以下 ?
本次练习耗时 10min
查看模考评分报告
本次模考获得成长值
+0
距下一级还差 0 成长值
结果详情

Si-Rater 写作机评

登录后使用AI批改

我的作文
自测得分: --
总评 --
根据ETS官方评分标准,预测口语得分
  • 证明观点的能力 Development 0
  • 语言组织能力与逻辑 Organization 0
  • 语法与词汇的使用 Use of grammar and vocabulary 0
分数计算中,请稍后
重新打分
计算本篇分数
From my perspective, I strongly believe that relying on educational games as the primary learning tool for children is inadvisable. This stance aligns with Andrew's viewpoint. Additionally, I argue that although educational games aim to engage and motivate learners, there is a risk that students may become overly focused on the gameplay rather than the educational content.
While Claire emphasized the benefits of introducing young children to computers and educational games for early exposure to academic subjects, she overlooked the fact that early childhood is a crucial period for development in areas like social skills, physical activity, and sensory experiences. Excessive screen time, including computer use, can hinder development in these critical areas.
查看全文 收起全文
本题统计:写了 113字 共练习 10min
题目信息

Doctor Achebe

Companies now make computer games designed to help very young children learn. The games are advertised for use by children aged 2 to 8 years and often involve basic math and reading skills. presented in a fun, game-like style. Some people say that this results in children spending too much time looking at computer screens. Do you think it’s a good idea for very young children to play educational computer games? Why or why not?

Andrew

I think it’s completely inappropriate for children as young as 2 years old to play what are essentially video games. Even if the games are educational, the same skills can be taught in traditional ways—by reading books to children. for example. And it would be beneficial to interact with their parents in this way.

Kelly

Considering how important computers are to human societies these days, I think it actually makes sense to allow very young children to explore them. And if the computer games that children play also give them early access to subject matter that will later be taught in school, all the better.

本题优质内容
  • 网友思路
  • 范文
  • 名师思路
  • 查看更多数据>>

  • From my perspective, I strongly believe that relying on educational games as the primary learning tool for children is inadvisable. This stance aligns with Andrew's viewpoint. Additionally, I argue that although educational games aim to engage and motivate learners, there is a risk that students may become overly focused on the gameplay rather than the educational content. This excessive emphasis on gaming or dependence on games for learning can lead to distractions and a reduction in attention to other vital educational facets.

     

    While Claire emphasized the benefits of introducing young children to computers and educational games for early exposure to academic subjects, she overlooked the fact that early childhood is a crucial period for development in areas like social skills, physical activity, and sensory experiences. Excessive screen time, including computer use, can hinder development in these critical areas.

     

    In my opinion, relying exclusively on educational games as the primary educational tool for children is not recommended.


  • 会员福利内容准备中,丰富答题思路即将上线

最新提问

分数说明

1. E-rater 是ETS在托福考试中真实使用的写作机评系统,具有很高的参考价值。因真实的考试中还有人类评分的环节,因此机器评分不能简单等同于最终的考试分数

2. 经过对测试用户写作成绩数据分析,考满分老师为大家提供了 E-rater 与真实考试分数的对应关系,供参考:

原始分数与水平对应关系
(老师会跟进数据并不定期更新)
机评分数 参考成绩
5 - 6 25 分以上
3 - 4 18 - 24 分
1 - 2 17 分以下