考满分托福听力新题模考(第003套)

模考详情
分享小红书,免费领会员
Font Size: 默认
  • Font Size:默认
  • Font Size:14px
  • Font Size:20px
  • Font Size:16px
  • Font Size:18px
Speed: Normal
  • Slow:0.8倍
  • Normal:1.0倍
  • Fast:1.2倍
  • Rush:1.5倍
听力原文
精听文本

Question 3 of 6

收藏本题
Why does the professor mention the mercantilists of the 17th and 18th centuries?

A. To explain how the idea of buying stock in companies came about

B. To point out who first identified the need for regulation of international trade

C. To illustrate how international trade expanded to include stocks and bonds

D. To identify the origin of the negative attitude towards trade deficits

我的答案 C 正确答案 D

本题用时23s
  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 题目讨论
  • 本题对应音频:
    0 感谢 0 不懂
    音频1
    解析

    【题型分类】:组织结构题(根据Why...mention...判断)

    【题干分析】:问为什么要提到the mercantilists of the 17th and 18th centuries,考查目的,而非具体细节信息,需结合上下文作答


    Typically, people view positive net exports are favorable and trade deficits, negative net exports, as unfavorable to a country. However, the idea that a trade surplus benefits a country more than a trade deficit is a fallacy. Its simply not consistent with sound economic ideas and principles. That erroneous idea started in the 17th and 18th centuries with the mercantilists.

    Mercantilists believed in prompting exports but restricting and regulating imports. So, they treated a trade surplus as a good thing and a trade deficit as a bad thing. This fallacy still lingers in the minds of many people today. The fallacy arises from focusing on only one part of the trade activity, namely goods and services, rather than on the countrys total international trade including capital flows.

    【选项分析】:

    A ×:stock股票的信息是下一段解释资本是如何交易的才提到的,与本题无关,属于跨区干扰,排除

    B ×:原文没有提及是谁首次发现国际贸易规则制定的必要,只是说(Mercantilists believed in prompting exports but restricting and regulating imports)重商主义者认为要多出口,少进口,故排除;注意积累词汇,这里的promote是促进,regulate是严格控制的意思

    C ×stocks and bonds的信息是下一段解释资本是如何交易的才提到的,与本题无关,属于跨区干扰,而且原文也没有讲国际贸易扩大了才包含股票和债券,本来国际贸易就分两种,一类是商品和服务的贸易;一类是资本的贸易,故排除

    D ✔️:提到17、18世纪的重商主义者之前有分论点指出以前人们一直认为贸易剩余比贸易逆差好,但是这个观点其实是错误的,这个观点起始于17、18世纪的重商主义者,后面就具体展开解释这个错误观点是怎么来的,和D是同义替换

    【题目难度】:中

    标签
  • 题目讨论

    如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。

译文

Listen to part of a lecture in an Economics class(female professor) No doubt you’ve been hearing a lot about how the United States has trade deficits with this country or that country and in the news they make it seem like such a terrible thing.Well, today, we’re going to set the record straight by looking at the big picture. OK?So, trade activities between countries are divided into two categories: one, the exchange of goods and services, and two, the exchange of capital. OK?goods and services and capital.Now, one of the statistics used to measure international trade activities is net exports.Net exports is the difference in value between how much businesses in the country export and how much they import.We say that a country’s net exports are positive when it exports more goods and services than it imports.And a country’s net exports are negative when its businesses import more goods and services than they export. OK?Now, another word for a negative net export is trade deficit. So, a country with a trade deficit imports more than it exports.It buys more than it sells.Typically, people view positive net exports as favorable and trade deficits, negative net exports as unfavorable to a country.However, the idea that a trade surplus benefits a country more than a trade deficit is a fallacy.It’s simply not consistent with sound economic ideas and principles.That erroneous idea started in the 17th and 18th centuries with the mercantilists.Mercantilists believed in promoting exports but restricting and regulating imports.So, they treated a trade surplus as a good thing and a trade deficit as a bad thing.This fallacy still lingers in the minds of many people today.The fallacy arises from focusing on only one part of the trade activity, namely goods and services, rather than on the country’s total international trade including capital flows.And to keep things simple, when I refer to capital, I’m talking about money.To understand why we shouldn’t conclude that trade deficits are, by themselves, the source of concern, we need to examine how a country’s total international transactions are calculated.OK? If a country runs a trade deficit, its exports of goods and services are not paying for its imports.What we are saying here is that when you run a trade deficit that deficit must be financed.It has to be paid for. To finance this trade deficit, a country must be a net importer of capital, of money.So, money, in the form of investments, comes into the country and makes up the difference in value between the exports and imports of goods and services.Uh, for example, when the United States finances other countries' trade deficits, it buys, for example, bonds and stocks in those countries.That would be a capital outflow, also referred to as a capital export, because the money is going out from the United States and going into another country.Now, I mentioned stocks and bonds.Quickly, stocks are issued by companies in order to raise money.Buying a stock is like buying a very small piece of a company.You actually become a part owner.And, when the company’s successful, then generally the value of the stock rises.Conversely, if the company does poorly, then the value of its stock can fall.When you purchase a bond, you’re actually lending a company or even a government, you’re lending them money.And the bond is the company, or government’s promise to pay you back the money you lent them, plus interest, at a specific time in the future.So, for example, if you purchased a government bond that matures in five years and has an interest rate of five percent that means in five years you would get back your initial investment plus additional money in accumulated interest.So, when the United States runs a trade deficit, we would expect that other countries would buy stocks, bonds or other financial assets in the United States and then there would be a capital inflow or capital import that makes up for the United States' trade deficit.So, any good international economist would tell you, “Do not view a trade deficit as a bad thing.Instead, look at the total transactions of capital as well as goods and services when you evaluate any country’s international trade position.”