Should local or national governments promote tourism to remote regions not typically visited by tourists before?

问题

Your professor is teaching a class on economics. Write a post responding to the professor`s question. In your response, you should do the following. .
• Express and support your opinion.
• Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words..
An effective response will contain at least 100 words.

Doctor Diaz

Our current unit looks at tourism and the benefit it has on a country’s economy. Many argue that while tourism can indeed be a money-making endeavor, it can do more harm than good, especially tourism to small, remote places that are not heavily populated. What is your opinion? Should local or national governments promote tourism to remote regions not typically visited by tourists before? Why?

Andrew

Tourism has always been a lucrative business. Improving the economies of these rural regions, especially if those regions are poor, can only have a positive effect. People can have a better quality of life by showcasing their food and traditions to the outside world. It’s a chance the people might not get without promotion from the government.

Claire

I don’t think governments should promote tourism to remote regions. The people are likely not asking for this kind of industry or for this kind of attention. Instead, governments should develop other means of improving a region's economic situation, like expanding agriculture or other industries. These efforts will have a stronger, more permanent impact on the region than bringing in groups of tourists.

练习本题

查看笔记

精华内容

答题思路
范文
题目讨论
名师思路

In my personal viewpoint, I am convinced that promoting tourism in remote areas offers more advantages than disadvantages. This opinion aligns with Kelley's view that encouraging tourism can greatly enhance the quality of life for local communities. I further argue that cultural exchange represents a significant benefit of promoting tourism in remote regions. By drawing in visitors, these areas have the opportunity to exhibit their unique traditions, customs, and heritage, facilitating an exchange of cultural knowledge. This interaction allows locals to share their narratives and experiences, fostering cross-cultural understanding, appreciation, and respect. It also provides tourists with a deeper understanding of the rich diversity of these remote communities, supporting cultural preservation and forging enduring bonds between individuals from diverse backgrounds.

While Paul pointed out that governments could improve a region's economic status by diversifying industries beyond tourism, he overlooked the fact that while developing sectors like agriculture offers long-term advantages, it often necessitates considerable time, investment, and resources to develop and grow. Conversely, tourism can offer an immediate source of revenue and employment, significantly enhancing the economic conditions of remote areas.

From my perspective, I firmly believe that the promotion of tourism in remote regions is more beneficial than detrimental.
会员福利内容准备中，丰富答题思路即将上线

Should local or national governments promote tourism to remote regions not typically visited by tourists before?

精华内容

最新提问