I agree with Paul’s perspective that schools should prioritize funding for additional resources, such as books and computers, rather than increasing teachers' salaries. I would add on Paul's point that investing in these resources can enhance the learning environment for students. For example, well-stocked libraries and updated learning materials can provide students with a broader range of knowledge, allowing them to explore subjects in greater depth. This kind of exposure encourages independent learning and critical thinking, which are crucial for academic success.

While Kelly argued that increasing teachers' pay could attract more qualified individuals to the profession, she fails to consider that additional resources could also alleviate teachers’ workload and improve classroom dynamics. For example, interactive learning tools or better classroom equipment can make teaching more efficient and engaging, allowing teachers to focus more on individual student needs. This would not only enhance the student learning experience but also indirectly improve teacher performance without the need for higher salaries.

In conclusion, I believe that schools should allocate more funding to resources and technology, as this approach directly enhances the quality of education and ensures that students are prepared for the demands of a rapidly changing world.