How can governments reduce carbon dioxide emissions from cars, improving public transportation or providing financial support to electric-car manufacturers and consumers?

纠错
问题

Your professor is teaching a class on environment. Write a post responding to the professor`s question. In your response, you should do the following.
• Express and support your opinion.
• Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words.
An effective response will contain at least 100 words.

老师头像

Doctor Diaz

This week we’ve discussed how carbon dioxide released by gasoline-powered (petrol-powered) cars pollutes the air and contributes to climate change. Let’s focus now on two proposals that governments can consider as they try to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from cars. One proposal is to improve and expand public transportation. The other is to provide financial support to companies that make electric cars and to consumers who buy them. Which proposal do you think is better? Why?
学生头像

Claire

I think improving public transportation would be more beneficial overall than giving tax breaks or rebates to particular companies and consumers. If taking a train or a bus is significantly easier,cheaper,and faster than driving a car, more people will want to use public transportation. With fewer cars on the road. there will be less air pollution.
学生头像

Paul

I believe that providing financial support to electric-car manufacturers and consumers is the better innovative long- term strategy. Many people live in rural areas, and they need their own vehicles to get around. These people would not benefit from, say, more train lines being built in a far-off city.
练习本题
查看笔记

精华内容

  • 答题思路
  • 范文
  • 题目讨论
  • 名师思路

  • In my view, I am strongly convinced that enhancing public transportation would be a more effective method for reducing carbon dioxide emissions, a belief that coincides with Andrew's argument that people are more inclined to use public transportation when it is more convenient and accessible. I further contend that the expansion of public transportation is pivotal in reducing traffic congestion in urban areas. Smoother traffic flow results in fewer instances of vehicles idling, which is less fuel-efficient and leads to increased emissions. By diminishing congestion, public transportation aids in creating a more efficient and eco-friendly transport system.

     

    While Claire emphasized that offering financial incentives to both electric-car manufacturers and consumers represents a superior long-term approach, particularly for those in rural areas dependent on personal vehicles, she overlooked the fact that electric vehicles (EVs) may not be the most viable option in all rural settings due to the scarcity of charging stations and the necessity for vehicles with longer driving ranges. Conversely, the development of efficient public transportation systems can serve a broader segment of the population, including those who might not have the means or the opportunity to effectively utilize electric vehicles.

     

    In summary, I am firmly of the opinion that improving public transportation is a more effective strategy for reducing carbon dioxide emissions.


  • 会员福利内容准备中,丰富答题思路即将上线

最新提问