The chemical elements that make up cells are likely to be available on just about any planet.
我的笔记 编辑笔记
The creation of life requires a set of chemical elements for making the components of cells. Life on Earth uses about 25 of the 92 naturally occurring chemical elements, although just 4 of these elements-oxygen, carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen-make up about 96 percent of the mass of living organisms. Thus, a first requirement for life might be the presence of most or all of the elements used by life.
Interestingly, this requirement can probably be met by almost any world. Scientists have determined that all chemical elements in the universe besides hydrogen and helium (and a trace amount of lithium) were produced by stars. These are known as heavy elements because they are heavier than hydrogen and helium. Although all of these heavy elements are quite rare compared to hydrogen and helium, they are found just about everywhere.
Heavy elements are continually being manufactured by stars and released into space by stellar deaths , so their amount compared to hydrogen and helium gradually rises with time. Heavy elements make up about 2 percent of the chemical content (by mass) of our solar system; the other 98 percent is hydrogen and helium. In some very old star systems, which formed before many heavy elements were produced, the heavy-element share may be less than 0.1 percent. Nevertheless , every star system studied has at least some amount of all the elements used by life. Moreover, when planetesimals-small, solid objects formed in the early solar system that may accumulate to become planets-condense within a forming star system, they are inevitably made from heavy elements because the more common hydrogen and helium remain gaseous. Thus, planetesimals everywhere should contain the elements needed for life, which means that objects built from planetesimals-planets, moons, asteroids, and comets-also contain these elements. The nature of solar-system formation explains why Earth contains all the elements needed for life, and it is why we expect these elements to be present on other worlds throughout our solar system, galaxy, and universe.
Note that this argument does not change, even if we allow for life very different from life on Earth. Life on Earth is carbon based, and most biologists believe that life elsewhere is likely to be carbon based as well. However, we cannot absolutely rule out the possibility of life with another chemical basis, such as silicon or nitrogen. The set of elements (or their relative proportions) used by life based on some other element might be somewhat different from that used by carbon-based life on Earth. But the elements are still products of stars and would still be present in planetesimals everywhere. No matter what kinds of life we are looking for, we are likely to find the necessary elements on almost every planet, moon, asteroid, and comet in the universe.
A somewhat stricter requirement is the presence of these elements in molecules that can be used as ready-made building blocks for life, just as early Earth probably had an organic soup of amino acids and other complex molecules. Earth`s organic molecules likely came from some combination of three sources: chemical reactions in the atmosphere, chemical reactions near deep-sea vents in the oceans, and molecules carried to Earth by asteroids and comets. The first two sources can occur only on worlds with atmospheres or oceans, respectively. But the third source should have brought similar molecules to nearly all worlds in our solar system.
Studies of meteorites and comets suggest that organic molecules are widespread among both asteroids and comets. Because each body in the solar system was repeatedly struck by asteroids and comets during the period known as the heavy bombardment (about 4 billion years ago), each body should have received at least some organic molecules. However, these molecules tend to be destroyed by solar radiation on surfaces unprotected by atmospheres. Moreover, while these molecules might stay intact beneath the surface (as they evidently do on asteroids and comets), they probably cannot react with each other unless some kind of liquid or gas is available to move them about. Thus, if we limit our search to worlds on which organic molecules are likely to be involved in chemical reactions, we can probably rule out any world that lacks both an atmosphere and a surface or subsurface liquid medium, such as water.
文章结构:
第一段:生命的创造前提是需要化学元素。地球生命用了92种天然化学元素中的25种。
第二段:几乎所有的星球都存在大部分元素。除了氢和氦(以及微量的锂)之外,宇宙中的所有化学元素都是由恒星产生的。重元素稀少,但遍布各处。
第三段:1、重元素不断由恒星制造并通过恒星死亡释放到太空中,量逐渐增加。古老恒星系也存在生命所需元素。2、氢和氦气保持气态,星子由重元素组成。因此,星子构成的物质都包含生命所需要的元素。
第四段:地球截然不同的生命体。其他元素仍然是恒星的产物,都可能在宇宙中找到必要的元素。
第五段:分子中存在生命所需元素。地球有机分子三种来源:大气中的化学反应,海洋深海通风口附近的化学反应(条件:只能出现在有大气或海洋的星球上)以及小行星和彗星携带到地球的分子。
第六段:有机分子在小行星和彗星中很普遍。个体遭到小行星和彗星的袭击,所以每个个体都应该有有机分子。反应条件:某种液体或气体移动它们。
答案:BDF
题型:小结题
解析:
选项A错误,原文说地球生命使用了92种天然化学元素中的25种生命,未提及必须有4到25种自然存在的元素,取决于生物体的复杂性;
选项B 正确,对应原文第一二段,生命最常用的元素—氧、碳、氢和氮—也是宇宙中分布最广的元素;
选项C 错误,原文第三段说古老的恒星系统中,重元素份额可能低于0.1%,未提及生命最有可能在最古老的恒星系统中发现;
选项D正确,对应原文第三四段,行星、卫星、小行星和彗星都有重元素,这意味着它们含有任何生命形式的基础,无论是碳基的还是其他的;
选项E 错误,未提及生命最有可能存在于那些在太阳系形成期间没有受到小行星和彗星猛烈撞击的天体上;
选项F 正确,对应原文第六段,有机分子广泛存在,但这些分子之间的化学反应可能需要大气或液体介质。
如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。