机经真题 19 Passage 2

纠错
置顶

Forests after Rome

纠错

In paragraph 1, why does the author provide the information that sheep and goats “eat young trees and green shoots”?

Click on an oval to select your answer. To choose a different answer,

click one different oval.

  • A
    To suggest that grazing animals like sheep and goats were better adapted to small upland farms than they were to large-scale lowland agriculture
  • B
    To argue that grazing animals increased in number on small upland farms because there was an unlimited supply of food for them there
  • C
    To indicate why some historians believe that the increase in small upland farms led to more forest clearing
  • D
    To explain why large-scale Roman agriculture was more productive than small upland farming
显示答案
正确答案: C

我的笔记 编辑笔记

  • 原文
  • 译文
  • In the Mediterranean, the Roman Empire (27 B.C.E.-394 C.E.) focused agriculture in the lowlands and protected the wooded uplands. But this broke down as the Empire declined, starting around 300 C.E. as large-scale lowland agriculture was abandoned in favor of small upland farms. Some historians have claimed that this caused the subsequent increase in forest clearing (removal of trees), with a need for more small farms, and more grazing animals like sheep and goats (which eat young trees and green shoots). However, others consider this conclusion something of an exaggeration, as it overstates the extent to which widespread forest use meant forest clearance. Even in the absence of government control and supervision, many forces limited the exploitation of woodlands. Wooded land is valuable and likely to attract the interest and protection of powerful people whether they are figures of authority or not, so dense forests and sizable woodlands would typically have been off-limits to random exploitation. Jobs like building ships and roofing large structures require big forest trees. Demand was low, since shipbuilding was pointless when commerce was virtually nonexistent, and large structures are more usually built when population is increasing and cities are growing. Even where demand existed, transport remained a problem. The high cost and difficulty of cutting down a great tree was negligible compared with the expense and challenge of moving wood overland from the forest where it was harvested to the shipyard or building site where it was to be used.



    A factor that is harder for us to appreciate in an age when chain saws and wood splitters are widely available is the technological limitation on harvesting forest giants. Big trees contain many times the potential heat energy of small trees, but harvesting them and reducing them to wood that is useful for burning is a formidable task; the small hand tools that most villagers possessed were hardly up to the job. A householder was better off gathering and using small pieces of wood. For fires, fallen or hanging branches that had dried out over the course of a year or so were preferable.



    Two forest management techniques that Roman writers on farming advocated continued to be widely used after the fall of Rome. They survived not because they were mandated but because they were practical methods of producing renewable supplies of the small-dimension wood that met the needs of farmers. These techniques, known as coppicing and pollarding, are occasionally still practiced today, and many Mediterranean forests still bear the marks of this kind of cultivation. The purpose of coppicing is to transform a single-trunked tree into a producer of multiple fast-growing branches that can be harvested periodically. Mature trees are cut to the ground then allowed to sprout multiple trunks. A coppiced woodland is typically divided into sections that are harvested on a rotating basis. The length of the rotation depends on the speed with which the trees grow and the use to which the branches are to be put. Fast-growing trees might be harvested every four years; slower-growing trees, like oak, might require a fifty-year rotation. Instead of big trunks difficult to harvest and slow to regrow, coppiced woods produce multiple small-diameter sticks and poles. Pollarding works on the same principle as coppicing, but trees that are pollarded are cut back to a main trunk rather than to the ground. Where wild or domestic animals graze in forests, the new branches that grow from coppiced trees at ground level are likely to be eaten. With pollarded trees the productive source of new growth is raised above the level where animals browse.



    Neither deforestation nor upland erosion was widespread after the fall of Rome. Upland soils were enriched rather than depleted. Those who continued to live in the area appear to have adapted well to changed conditions. They relied on the time-tested technologies of simple, minimally destructive agriculture, cultivating olives, figs, and grapes and herding sheep. Grain, the largest Roman crop, continued to be raised on small plots or on flat areas cut out of the hillside shaded by olive trees or vines. This type of farming decreases erosion and surface water runoff. The sustainable agriculture that had characterized the region before the great Roman explosion once again served the inhabitants.


  • 在地中海地区,罗马帝国(公元前27年-公元394年)将农业集中在低地,并保护了林木茂密的高地。但随着帝国从公元300年左右开始衰落,这种情况发生了改变,大规模低地农业被放弃,转而兴建小型高地农场。一些历史学家认为,这导致了随后的森林砍伐增加,因为出现了对更多小型农场以及更多像羊和山羊这样吃树苗和嫩枝的放牧动物的需求。然而,另一些人认为这一结论有些夸大了,因为它过高估计了广泛使用森林等于森林砍伐的程度。即使没有政府的控制和监督,许多因素也限制了对林地的过度开发。林木茂密的土地很有价值,容易吸引有权势的人(无论他们是否是权威人士)的兴趣和保护,所以茂密的森林和大片的林地通常是不允许随意开采的。造船和建筑大结构如屋顶的工作需要大树。但需求很低,因为当商业几乎不存在时,造船是毫无意义的,而当人口增加和城市发展的时期,大型建筑结构的需求更多。然而,即使有需求,运输仍然是一个问题。与将木材从砍伐的森林运送到造船厂或建筑工地的费用和挑战相比,砍伐大树的高成本和困难微不足道。

    在一个链锯和劈木机广泛使用的时代,我们难以理解的一个因素是采伐巨型森林树木的技术限制。大树包含的潜在热能是小树的许多倍,但采伐它们并将其分解成可用于燃烧的木材是一项艰巨的任务;大多数村民拥有的小型手工工具几乎无法胜任这项工作。一个家庭更适合收集和使用小块木材。对于火焰来说,掉落或悬挂了一年左右并已干燥的树枝是更好的选择。

    罗马的农业作家们倡导的两种森林管理技术在罗马衰落后继续被广泛使用。它们之所以存续,不是因为被强制执行,而是因为它们是生产满足农民需求的小尺寸木材的实用方法。这些技术被称为“矮林法”和“截顶法”,今天偶尔仍在使用,许多地中海地区的森林仍然留有这种栽培的痕迹。矮林法的目的是将单干树转变为多产的多枝树,以便定期收获。成熟的树木被砍到地面,然后允许其萌发出多个树干。一个矮林通常分为几个部分,轮流收获。轮换周期的长短取决于树木的生长速度以及树枝的使用用途。快速生长的树木可能每四年收获一次;生长较慢的树木(如橡树)可能需要五十年的轮换周期。矮林产生的是多根小直径的枝条和树杆,而不是难以采伐且生长缓慢的大树干。截顶法的原理与矮林法相同,但截顶的树木是被砍回到主干,而不是砍到地面。在野生或家畜动物在林地放牧的地方,从地面长出的矮林新枝条很可能会被吃掉。而通过截顶法,树木新生长的多产部分被抬高到了动物采食的高度之上。

    在罗马陷落后,既没有大规模的森林砍伐,也没有广泛的高地侵蚀。高地土壤得到了丰富,而非耗竭。那些继续生活在该地区的人们似乎很好地适应了变化的环境。他们依靠的是经过时间考验的简单、破坏性最小的农业技术,种植橄榄、无花果和葡萄,并放牧绵羊。作为罗马最大的作物,谷物继续在小块地或在被橄榄树或葡萄藤遮阴的山坡上被种植。这样的农业方式减少了侵蚀和地表水径流。大规模罗马扩张前的该地区的可持续农业再次服务于其居民。
  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 标签
    0 感谢 不懂
    解析
    【答案】C
    【题型】修辞目的题
    【解析】
     题干问的是,作者提到羊和山羊“吃树苗和嫩枝”这一信息的目的。
    A. To suggest that grazing animals like sheep and goats were better adapted to small upland farms than they were to large-scale lowland agriculture
    这一选项暗示了羊和山羊是否更适应小型高地农场,而不是大规模低地农业。这与文章讨论的背景不符,文章并没有讨论这些动物适应性的比较。
    B. To argue that grazing animals increased in number on small upland farms because there was an unlimited supply of food for them there
    这一选项假设小型高地农场上食物供应无限,导致这些动物数量增加。虽然文中提到这些动物吃树苗和嫩枝,但这并不能直接推断出食物供应无限。
    C. To indicate why some historians believe that the increase in small upland farms led to more forest clearing
    这一选项准确地概括了提供该信息的原因。文中的确解释了为什么一些历史学家认为高地农场的增加导致了更多的森林砍伐:这些动物吃掉树苗和嫩枝,导致森林无法再生。
    D. To explain why large-scale Roman agriculture was more productive than small upland farming
    这一选项偏离了文章的主题。文章并没有比较大规模罗马农业和小型高地农业的生产力,而是讨论森林砍伐的原因。

题目讨论

如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。

最新提问