机经真题 14 Passage 2

纠错
置顶

Light and the Atmosphere

纠错

Paragraph 1 suggests that which of the following would happen if there were no scattering of light in Earth's atmosphere?

Click on an oval to select your answer. To choose a different answer,

click one different oval.

  • A
    Earth's surface would receive more ultraviolet light and x-rays than visible light.
  • B
    Earth's surface would be less warm.
  • C
    Stars would be visible during the day.
  • D
    We would not be able to see the Moon.
显示答案
正确答案: C

我的笔记 编辑笔记

  • 原文
  • 译文
  • The key to understanding Earth's atmosphere lies in interactions between atmospheric gases and energy from the Sun. Although the Sun also emits ultraviolet light and x-rays, most light coming from the Sun is visible light. Most visible sunlight reaches the ground and warms the surface, but the small amount that is scattered by gases in the atmosphere has two important effects. First, scattering makes the daytime sky bright, which is why we can't see stars in the daytime. Without scattering, sunlight would travel only in perfectly straight lines, which means we'd see the Sun against an otherwise black sky, just as it appears on the Moon. Scattering also prevents shadows on Earth from being pitch black. On the Moon, shadows receive little scattered sunlight and are extremely cold and dark.



    Second, scattering explains why our sky is blue. Gas molecules scatter blue light (higher energy) much more effectively than red light (lower energy). The difference in scattering is so great that, for practical purposes, we can imagine that only the blue light gets scattered. When the Sun is overhead, this scattered blue light reaches our eyes from all directions and the sky appears blue. At sunset or sunrise, the sunlight must pass through a greater amount of atmosphere on its way to us. Most of the blue light is scattered away, leaving only red light to color the sky.



    The ground returns the energy it absorbs by radiating it away in the infrared (light with even less energy than red light). Greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide absorb this infrared light and warm the troposphere - the lowest layer in the atmosphere. Because the infrared light comes from the surface, more is absorbed closer to the ground than at higher altitudes, which is why the temperature drops with altitude in the troposphere. (The relatively small amount of infrared light coming from the Sun does not have a significant effect on the atmosphere.) The drop in temperature with altitude, combined with the relatively high density of air in the troposphere, explains why the troposphere is the only layer of the atmosphere with storms. The primary cause of storms is the churning of air by convection, in which warm air rises and cool air falls. Convection occurs only when there is strong heating from below; in the troposphere, the heating from the ground can drive convection. In fact, the troposphere gets its name from convection; tropos is Greek for "turning."



    Above the troposphere, the air density is too low for greenhouse gases to have much effect, so infrared light from below can travel unhindered through higher layers of the atmosphere and into space. Heating from below therefore has little effect on the stratosphere, the second lowest layer in the atmosphere. Instead, the primary source of heating in the stratosphere is the absorption of solar ultraviolet light by the gas ozone. Most of this ultraviolet absorption and heating occurs at moderately high altitudes in the stratosphere, which is why temperature tends to increase with altitude as we go upward from the base of the stratosphere. This temperature structure prevents convection in the lower stratosphere, because heat cannot rise if the air above is hotter. The lack of convection makes the air relatively stagnant and stratified (layered), with layers of warm air overlying cooler air; this stratification explains the name stratosphere. The lack of convection also means that the stratosphere has essentially no weather and no rain. Pollutants that reach the stratosphere, including the ozone-destroying chemicals known as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), remain there for decades.


  • 理解地球大气层的关键在于大气气体与太阳能量之间的相互作用。虽然太阳还发射紫外线和X射线,但大多数来自太阳的光是可见光。大多数可见的阳光到达地面并加热地表,而被大气中的气体散射的少量阳光则有两个重要的效果。首先,散射使白天的天空变得明亮,这就是为什么我们在白天看不到星星的原因。没有散射,阳光只能沿着完全笔直的线传播,这意味着我们会在一个漆黑的天空中看到太阳,就像它在月球上呈现的那样。散射还防止了地球上的阴影变得漆黑。在月球上,阴影中几乎没有散射的阳光,因此非常冷和黑暗。

    其次,散射解释了为什么我们的天空是蓝色的。气体分子比起红光(低能量)更有效地散射蓝光(高能量)。散射的差异如此之大,以至于在实际情况下,我们可以想象只有蓝光被散射。当太阳在头顶时,这些散射的蓝光从各个方向到达我们的眼睛,使天空看起来是蓝色的。在日落或日出时,阳光必须穿过更多的大气层到达我们这里。大多数蓝光被散射掉了,只剩下红光来染红天空。

    地面通过辐射红外线(能量比红光更低的光)将吸收的能量释放出去。像二氧化碳这样的温室气体吸收这些红外光并加热对流层 - 大气层中最低的一层。由于红外光从地表辐射出来,因此在接近地面的地方吸收到更多的红外光,而在更高的海拔处吸收到的则更少,这就是为什么对流层中温度随着海拔的升高而下降的原因。(来自太阳的相对较少的红外光不会对大气产生显著影响。)温度随着海拔的下降,加上对流层中相对较高的空气密度,解释了为什么对流层是大气层中唯一有风暴的层。风暴的主要原因是空气通过对流的翻腾,其中暖空气上升,冷空气下降。对流只发生在从下方有强烈加热的情况下;在对流层中,地面的加热可以驱动对流。事实上,对流层这个名字就来源于对流;"tropos"在希腊语中是“翻腾”的意思。

    在对流层之上,空气密度太低,温室气体难以起作用,因此来自下方的红外光可以不受阻碍地穿过更高的大气层进入太空。因此,从下方的加热对大气层的第二层——平流层几乎没有影响。相反,平流层的主要加热来源是气体臭氧对太阳紫外线的吸收。大多数的紫外线吸收和加热发生在平流层中等高度处,这就是为什么从平流层底部往上,温度往往随着高度的增加而升高。这种温度结构阻止了平流层下层的对流,因为如果上方的空气更热,热量就无法上升。缺乏对流使得空气相对停滞和分层(分层),热空气层覆盖在冷空气层之上,这种分层解释了“平流层”这个名字。缺乏对流也意味着平流层基本上没有天气变化和降雨。到达平流层的污染物,包括破坏臭氧的化学物质——氯氟烃(CFCs),会在平流层中停留数十年。
  • 官方解析
  • 网友贡献解析
  • 标签
    0 感谢 不懂
    解析
    【答案】C
    【题型】推理题
    【解析】从第一段的内容可以得出,如果地球大气层中没有光的散射,以下哪一选项会发生:
    A. 地表将会接收到比可见光更多的紫外线和X射线。
    B. 地表会变得不那么温暖。
    C. 白天我们能够看到星星。
    D. 我们将无法看到月亮。
    根据段落内容,"First, scattering makes the daytime sky bright, which is why we can't see stars in the daytime. Without scattering, sunlight would travel only in perfectly straight lines, which means we'd see the Sun against an otherwise black sky, just as it appears on the Moon." 如选项C所述,若没有光散射,白天我们能够看到星星。因为散射使得白天空亮,而没有散射的话,阳光只会沿直线传播,所以我们将看到一个黑暗的天空,这样白天也能看见星星。
    其他选项不符合段落内容的推论,其中:
    A选项与紫外线和X射线无关,因为文章并未提到这些光散射的影响。
    B选项未涉及温暖程度,最多可以推测由于直达地面的阳光增多而可能变暖。
    D选项原文没提。

题目讨论

如果对题目有疑问,欢迎来提出你的问题,热心的小伙伴会帮你解答。

最新提问