句间停顿:
  • 1S
  • 3S
  • 5S
语速: x 1.0
  • 速度0.8X
  • 速度1.0X
  • 速度1.2X
  • 速度1.5X
  • 速度1.8X
  • 速度2X
始终显示原文
欢迎使用 KMF 精听精研
坚持练习精听,反复听、吃透每个句子,能够快速 提升听力能力
开始精听
或按 「 空格」开始播放

段落1

This is Scientific American 60-Second Science. I'm Karen Hopkin.This'll just take a minute.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

The Stradivarius is arguably the finest violin ever made.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

But could you tell one from a modern instrument?

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Was that a Strad?

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

How about that?

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Well, if you can't tell the difference, don't feel bad.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Neither could a group of accomplished violinists.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

That surprising result appears in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Old Italian violins have a reputation for being superior in sound to newer models.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

But is their reputation deserved?

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

To find out, researchers blindfolded 10 renowned violin soloists and had them play a dozen violins, six new and six old.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

When asked to guess the age of the instruments, the musicians failed to distinguish classic from modern at levels better than chance.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

And the new violins received higher overall marks than the antiques.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

When asked which violin they would choose to take on tour, six out of the 10 went with a modern instrument.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

The others grabbed Strads.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

The results suggest that modern violins perform as well as the classics.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

And that modern violinists are better at performing than at picking violins.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Thanks for the minute, for Scientific American 60-Second Science. I'm Karen Hopkin.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=
[ < 空格 > ]
当前句 /
/
  • 段落1
  • 第 1 句
  • 第 2 句
  • 第 3 句
  • 第 4 句
  • 第 5 句
  • 第 6 句
  • 第 7 句
  • 第 8 句
  • 第 9 句
  • 第 10 句
  • 第 11 句
  • 第 12 句
  • 第 13 句
  • 第 14 句
  • 第 15 句
  • 第 16 句
  • 第 17 句
  • 第 18 句

+ 创建收藏夹
保存 取消