反馈建议 切换旧版 去做题 结束训练
全文精听 逐句精听
句间停顿： 关
  • 关
  • 1S
  • 3S
  • 5S
语速： x 1.0
  • 速度0.8X
  • 速度1.0X
  • 速度1.2X
  • 速度1.5X
  • 速度1.8X
  • 速度2X
始终显示原文
欢迎使用 KMF 精听精研
坚持练习精听，反复听、吃透每个句子，能够快速 提升听力能力
开始精听
或按 「 空格」开始播放

段落1

This is Scientific American 60-Second Science. I'm Christopher Intagliata. Got a minute?

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

It can be rude to talk politics over dinner¡ explicitly at least.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

But subtle linguistic cues might reveal more than you think about your political views, whether at the dinner table or on Twitter.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

"There's a lot of information in the details of our language."

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Matthew Purver, a computational linguist at Queen Mary University of London.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

"The little words we use, the way we join together our sentences, and the kind of interactional patterns, where we react to other people."

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Purver's research team used Twitter as their communications forum, randomly selecting 28,000 users, half of whom clearly followed one political party's Twitter feeds, for example, @GOP,

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

but not the other, for a more or less even split among Republicans and Democrats.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Then they analyzed the words in those users' timelines during a two-week period in June 2014.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

As you might expect, the tweets of users who followed Republican accounts were a lot more likely to contain words like "obamacare" and "benghazi," whereas "bridgegate" came up more among Democratic followers.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

But the researchers also found that the left-leaners were much more likely to use words like sh#& and fu@$ than were the righties.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

And whereas Republican followers preferred plural pronouns like "we" or "us," Democratic followers used more singular pronouns, like "I" or "me."

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

That pronoun use could reflect previous work on how people on the right and left forge their political views.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

"People on the right end of the political spectrum are more likely to be concerned with group conformity.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Whereas people who tend to be on the left are perhaps more likely to see their morals or their values deriving from individualistic ideas, if you like."

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

The study is in the journal PLOS ONE.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Of course, just following a political account is not proof of political belief.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

But these findings suggest that algorithms may increasingly be able to read between the lines, detecting nuances in human communication that even we humans can't perceive.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Thanks for the minute, for Scientific American 60-Second Science. I'm Christopher Intagliata.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=
[ < 空格 > ]
当前句 /
/
  • 段落1
  • 第 1 句
  • 第 2 句
  • 第 3 句
  • 第 4 句
  • 第 5 句
  • 第 6 句
  • 第 7 句
  • 第 8 句
  • 第 9 句
  • 第 10 句
  • 第 11 句
  • 第 12 句
  • 第 13 句
  • 第 14 句
  • 第 15 句
  • 第 16 句
  • 第 17 句
  • 第 18 句
  • 第 19 句

+ 创建收藏夹
保存 取消