反馈建议 切换旧版 去做题 结束训练
全文精听 逐句精听
句间停顿： 关
  • 关
  • 1S
  • 3S
  • 5S
语速： x 1.0
  • 速度0.8X
  • 速度1.0X
  • 速度1.2X
  • 速度1.5X
  • 速度1.8X
  • 速度2X
始终显示原文
欢迎使用 KMF 精听精研
坚持练习精听，反复听、吃透每个句子，能够快速 提升听力能力
开始精听
或按 「 空格」开始播放

段落1

This is Scientific American 60-Second Mind, I'm Christie Nicholson. Got a minute?

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Next time a three-year old tells you what to do you might want to listen.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Because three-year-olds can recognize when we adults are doing something counterproductive and are keen to help us find a better way.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

That's according to new research in the journal Developmental Psychologyl.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Scientists had 58 three-year-olds examine several functional and nonfunctional objects.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Like a real phone and a toy phone, or a working marker and a dried-up marker.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Then the researcher would say something like, "I need to make a phone call, can you get me the phone."

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Sometimes the researcher would point to a real phone and other times point to the toy phone.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

The children would consistently bring over the functional item, regardless of whether the researcher pointed to it or asked specifically for it.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

In contrast, when they were told the item would just be thrown out, they'd bring either the nonfunctional or functional object.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

And in the case when any object would do, such as something that could act as a paperweight, the children brought either the fake one or the real one.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Ultimately the children focused on the end goal and deliberately choose the best item, as opposed to what was instructed of them.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

A good reminder for us adults.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Thanks for the minute, for Scientific American's 60-Second Mind. I'm Christie Nicholson.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=
[ < 空格 > ]
当前句 /
/
  • 段落1
  • 第 1 句
  • 第 2 句
  • 第 3 句
  • 第 4 句
  • 第 5 句
  • 第 6 句
  • 第 7 句
  • 第 8 句
  • 第 9 句
  • 第 10 句
  • 第 11 句
  • 第 12 句
  • 第 13 句
  • 第 14 句

+ 创建收藏夹
保存 取消