句间停顿:
  • 1S
  • 3S
  • 5S
语速: x 1.0
  • 速度0.8X
  • 速度1.0X
  • 速度1.2X
  • 速度1.5X
  • 速度1.8X
  • 速度2X
始终显示原文
欢迎使用 KMF 精听精研
坚持练习精听,反复听、吃透每个句子,能够快速 提升听力能力
开始精听
或按 「 空格」开始播放

段落1

This is Scientific American's 60-Second Tech. I'm Larry Greenemeier. Got a minute?

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Most of us are unlikely to be the target of a wiretap.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Although that assumption depends on how you define "wiretap."

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

A group of e-mail users are claiming that, when Google scans Gmails looking for ways to serve customized ads to Gmail users and create user profiles, it's wiretapping.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Some of these claimants are Gmail users,

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

but many are non-Gmail users who correspond with people who use Gmail addresses.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

The lawsuit says that non-Gmailers never agreed to have their e-mails intercepted and scanned by Google.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

The company tried to get the case tossed.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

A U.S.district judge did throw out claims that Google violated state privacy laws.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

But the judge allowed the federal wiretapping case to proceed.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Google can defend itself by proving it needs to scan messages to provide its e-mail service.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Or it can ask non-Gmail users for permission to keep doing what it already does.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Not exactly the stuff of a Hollywood spy thriller.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Still, in this era of NSA whistleblowing and Wikileaks maybe people are starting to wonder about the privacy costs of "free" e-mail.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=

Thanks for the minute, for Scientific American's 60-Second Tech. I'm Larry Greenemeier.

点击显示原文

隐藏原文=
[ < 空格 > ]
当前句 /
/
  • 段落1
  • 第 1 句
  • 第 2 句
  • 第 3 句
  • 第 4 句
  • 第 5 句
  • 第 6 句
  • 第 7 句
  • 第 8 句
  • 第 9 句
  • 第 10 句
  • 第 11 句
  • 第 12 句
  • 第 13 句
  • 第 14 句
  • 第 15 句

+ 创建收藏夹
保存 取消